On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > Update the wireguard.h file with the currently convential GPL2+userspace > exception tag. > > Note, this is a different license than what the text itself says in the > file, if you wish to stick with the MIT license for this file, that's > fine, but then it should be listed as: > ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)
I'd prefer doing only "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note", since it's more uniform, but I don't know if it covers a particular use use case: I expect for many projects to wholesale copy and paste this file into their own projects, and those projects might not be GPL-friendly. Does the Linux-syscall-note allow for that? Or should I stick with GPL-2.0||MIT for the avoidance of doubt? In terms of "intellectual property", the file itself is extremely boring, just defining some enums. Jason _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
