As some of you may know, the old Enterasys 11b NICs are OEM versions of
the old Lucent/Agere Orinoco NICs. Those cards were real work-horses --
very reliable, excellent receive sensitivity, and great driver support.
But like most 11b offerings, they are a legacy.

When Proxim bought the Orinoco product line from Agere, they were
essentialy buying the brand name. The new multi-band Orinoco cards are
based on the Atheros chipset so the only similarity is product name. The
vast majority of current a/b/g NICs are based on Atheros chipsets. In
most cases, vendors basically ship the Atheros reference design (which
is very good, BTW) with very minor software tweaks. In other cases (like
Proxim), they do substantially more internal development work, which can
be good or bad, depending on how good they are at it.

Even Cisco has moved to Atheros. Their 350 NICs were based on the old
Intersil PRISM chipset. For a short time, Cisco was selling an 11a NIC
based on technology they acquired from Radiata. But today, they appear
to be working with Atheros hardware, though they still do a lot of
driver/utility development in-house.

The other big player in today's NIC market is Broadcom, which has strong
relations with notebook manufacturers. Broadcom's strength is their b/g
design, which is often the standard WLAN NIC in non-Centrino notebooks.
Intel is a force that can't be ignored, but at this point, they are at
least a generation behind state-of-the-art.

I personaly think that it makes sense for Universities to "certify" NICs
internally and explicitly note which NICs are supported, but it's not
easy to do that. You have to battle the fact that the low-cost providers
like Linksys and Netgear often dual-source their components, so you
don't really know whether what you get today is the same as what you get
next month. It's also tough to effectively test NICs. We're working with
some new technology from a company called Azimuth that allows us to do
rate-versus-range and roaming testing in a programmatically controllable
RF isolation environment. In most cases, we can do this simply by
breaking open the NIC and attaching a cable to a jack. In other cases,
it's more complex.

We've noted substantial differences in performance, NIC to NIC, but we
are just getting started with this stuff. Frank Bulk, one of our grad
students here at Syracuse who also subscribes to this list, has quite a
bit of experience with this. It's worth noting that this kind of
testing, while valuable, has limitations. Most notably, it bypasses the
NIC's antennas (that's a potentially big issue, especially with embedded
notebook NICs), it doesn't factor in the effects of multipath
interference, and it really doesn't address many of the software issues
that cause you guys some many support problems.

dm

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jean-Paul Carter
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 9:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11 Adapter Card Evaluations
>
>
> Just a clarification on a previous post.  I got the
> compatibility matrix mixed up in my head.  The Enterasys B
> card requires no drivers for windows xp and is what we use to
> debug a students laptop.  Once we show them how it works, we
> recommend the Enterasys a/b/g card which does require the
> drivers to be installed from Enterasys.  I have been using a
> Enterasys B card since they came out and have been very
> impressed with the power consumption and the ability to pull
> in a signal.  Once the A/B/G version came out, I switched to
> that and am also equally impressed.
>
> John Carter
> Senior Network Systems Programmer
> IT Services
> Indiana Purdue University Ft. Wayne
> 2101 Coliseum Blvd
> Ft. Wayne  IN  46805
> 260 481-5473
> 260 481-4152 fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/cg/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/cg/.

Reply via email to