We use 802.1x using Windows IAS (RADIUS) server as the authentication
device. Wireless clients use EAP-LTS for encryption and authentication. An
Enterprise version of Microsoft Certificate Server issues the certificate
and re-news automatically on most clients. Most of our students have Windows
XP or Apple OS X 10.4, both clients work very well. We also have faculty
which use Pocket PC using the same certificate based
authentication/encryption. I had only one request for instructions on
connecting via wireless from a Linux box, so while we haven't tried it I'm
confident that it can be done given that OS X 10.4 is based on BSD Linux.
 
To make the process easier for student setup we did write a web interface
that will create and down load the correct variety of certificate.
 
I have to comment that all vendors have developed their CA Certificate
support dramatically. Anyone starting now would have a better experience
than when we started 4 years ago.
 

Dennis Rigdon, MCSE 
Dir. Network Services 
Okla. City Univ. 
405-208-5849 
  

 

  _____  

From: Nathan Hay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 8:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Transition from open to encrypted


We've been running our main SSID without encryption to make it easier for
students to connect and to make life easier for our help desk.  Not
surprisingly we've started to have problems with students sniffing packets
and capturing the IM passwords, etc of other students.
 
Because of this, we are working on a plan to make our main SSID encrypted by
the start of next school year.
 
Does anyone have a recommended scheme for encryption that supports a wide
variety of clients?  We have Windows, Mac, Linux, Nintendo Wii, and many
different types of handheld devices on campus.  Our wireless network is
Meru.
 
We don't have any 802.1x experience, but we are willing to learn if that is
where we need to head.  We'd like a scheme that makes it as easy for the
client to connect as possible, but still provides a good level of security.
 
Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated,
 
Nathan
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Nathan P. Hay
Network Engineer
Computer Services
Cedarville University
www.cedarville.edu <http://www.cedarville.edu/>  ********** Participation
and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion
list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to