Thanks for sharing.

I am still looking for a way to change the preference of a or b/g network
the card connecting to first. No help by calling the apple help line.

-- 
David Wang, Networking Services, CCS
www.uoguelph.ca 519-824-4120 x52046

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Philippe Hanset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This might be old news, but it had a pleasant discovery
> this morning when I decided to hold the option key on a Mac
> with Leopard and click on the Wireless Menu Icon (4 arcs).
>
> It shows:
> -Mac address of AP joined
> -Channel
> -RSSI
> -Transmit Rate
>
> It's going to our helpdesk folks right now!
>
> Best,
>
> Philippe
>
> ----------------------------------
> Philippe Hanset
> University of Tennessee, Knoxville
> Office of Information Technology
> Network Services
> 108 James D Hoskins Library
> 1400 Cumberland Ave
> Knoxville, TN 37996
> Tel: 1-865-9746555
> ----------------------------------
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
>
> > Philippe:
> >
> > The most relevant stuff seems to start here:
> >
> http://listserv.educause.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0507&L=WIRELESS-LAN&P=R273
> > 3&D=0&I=-3
> >
> > Search for "5429" in the archives to get all relevant messages.
> >
> > From a previous posting: "Basically your authentication server has to
> send
> > back the proper EAP failure message in order to get Windows to re-prompt
> for
> > the password."
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:55 AM
> > To: Frank Bulk
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x and Password issues!
> >
> > Yes!
> >
> > We use secureW2, Radiator and LDAP, but have not seen any report
> > of IIRC for that case.
> > During spring break we plan to switch to PEAP, built-in Windows Client,
> > and AD (we already have that running for our Exchange install.).
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> > PS: our 802.1x is optional. We still don't know if it's not successful
> >     because our implementation is cumbersome, or just because users
> >     want ultimate convenience ;-)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> > Philippe Hanset
> > University of Tennessee, Knoxville
> > Office of Information Technology
> > Network Services
> > 108 James D Hoskins Library
> > 1400 Cumberland Ave
> > Knoxville, TN 37996
> > Tel: 1-865-9746555
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Frank Bulk wrote:
> >
> > > Philippe:
> > >
> > > IIRC, there was an issue with some RADIUS servers that was causing the
> > > supplicant not to prompt the user to enter their new password.  Is
> that
> > your
> > > concern?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philippe
> Hanset
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:30 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x and Password issues!
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > How do you deal with 802.1x (eg: WPA2 EAP-PEAP) when:
> > >
> > > - your campus has a 6 months password change policy and
> > > - your email and 802.1x are sharing the same password (AD or LDAP) and
> > > - your users are storing the password on the supplicant and
> > > - those users don't realize that when they change their password they
> have
> > >   to change their supplicant password as well?
> > >
> > > Experience, thoughts?
> > >
> > > Do you have a lot of calls in your help desk related to this?
> > > If you had this issue how did you solve it?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Philippe
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > Philippe Hanset
> > > University of Tennessee, Knoxville
> > > Office of Information Technology
> > > Network Services
> > > ----------------------------------
> > >
> > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Jon Freeman wrote:
> > >
> > > > FYI - this configuration does not conform to the 802.11specifications.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jon
> > > > 303-808-2666
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > > From:         Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:43 PM Pacific Standard Time
> > > > To:   [email protected]
> > > > Subject:      Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Using 4 channels rather then 3 for
> the
> > > 2.4ghz wifi
> > > >
> > > > Nick,
> > > >
> > > > We have been doing 1-4-7-11
> > > > (but 1-4-8-11 makes more sense)
> > > > since 2000 and even with 802.11g we still like it.
> > > > The loss that you get from overlapping is largely regained
> > > > by having a 4th channel.
> > > > Other sources advise to play with smaller cell and reducing the
> > milliwatts
> > > > emitted from the AP instead of using 4 channels!
> > > > CIROND published a paper about the usage of 4 channels as well,
> > > > (search for CIROND, 4 channels, 802.11b...)
> > > > warning that though it is acceptable with CCK, it might create
> problems
> > > > with OFDM!
> > > >
> > > > Philippe
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > Philippe Hanset
> > > > University of Tennessee, Knoxville
> > > > Office of Information Technology
> > > > Network Services
> > > > 108 James D Hoskins Library
> > > > 1400 Cumberland Ave
> > > > Knoxville, TN 37996
> > > > Tel: 1-865-9746555
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Urrea, Nick wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We have a large study room at UC Hastings which accommodates up to
> 150
> > > > > students.
> > > > >
> > > > > On average I see about 80-100 users using the wifi in the room.
> > > > >
> > > > > To load balance the wifi in the room I have setup 4 APs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Right now we use the 3 non-overlapping 2.4ghz channels, 1, 6, and
> 11.
> > > > >
> > > > > The 4 APs are line of sight with each.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think it would be a good idea to go to 4 channels instead 3
> > > > >
> > > > > Ex: (1, 4, 8, 11)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicholas Urrea
> > > > >
> > > > > Information Technology
> > > > >
> > > > > UC Hastings College of the Law
> > > > >
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > x4718
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > **********
> > > > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> > Constituent
> > > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > **********
> > > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent
> > > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > **********
> > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent
> > > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> > >
> > > **********
> > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent
> > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> > >
> >
> >
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to