Philippe: The most relevant stuff seems to start here: http://listserv.educause.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0507&L=WIRELESS-LAN&P=R273 3&D=0&I=-3
Search for "5429" in the archives to get all relevant messages. >From a previous posting: "Basically your authentication server has to send back the proper EAP failure message in order to get Windows to re-prompt for the password." Frank -----Original Message----- From: Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:55 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x and Password issues! Yes! We use secureW2, Radiator and LDAP, but have not seen any report of IIRC for that case. During spring break we plan to switch to PEAP, built-in Windows Client, and AD (we already have that running for our Exchange install.). Philippe PS: our 802.1x is optional. We still don't know if it's not successful because our implementation is cumbersome, or just because users want ultimate convenience ;-) ---------------------------------- Philippe Hanset University of Tennessee, Knoxville Office of Information Technology Network Services 108 James D Hoskins Library 1400 Cumberland Ave Knoxville, TN 37996 Tel: 1-865-9746555 ---------------------------------- On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Frank Bulk wrote: > Philippe: > > IIRC, there was an issue with some RADIUS servers that was causing the > supplicant not to prompt the user to enter their new password. Is that your > concern? > > Regards, > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philippe Hanset > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x and Password issues! > > All, > > How do you deal with 802.1x (eg: WPA2 EAP-PEAP) when: > > - your campus has a 6 months password change policy and > - your email and 802.1x are sharing the same password (AD or LDAP) and > - your users are storing the password on the supplicant and > - those users don't realize that when they change their password they have > to change their supplicant password as well? > > Experience, thoughts? > > Do you have a lot of calls in your help desk related to this? > If you had this issue how did you solve it? > > Thanks, > > Philippe > > ---------------------------------- > Philippe Hanset > University of Tennessee, Knoxville > Office of Information Technology > Network Services > ---------------------------------- > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Jon Freeman wrote: > > > FYI - this configuration does not conform to the 802.11 specifications. > > > > Regards, > > Jon > > 303-808-2666 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:43 PM Pacific Standard Time > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Using 4 channels rather then 3 for the > 2.4ghz wifi > > > > Nick, > > > > We have been doing 1-4-7-11 > > (but 1-4-8-11 makes more sense) > > since 2000 and even with 802.11g we still like it. > > The loss that you get from overlapping is largely regained > > by having a 4th channel. > > Other sources advise to play with smaller cell and reducing the milliwatts > > emitted from the AP instead of using 4 channels! > > CIROND published a paper about the usage of 4 channels as well, > > (search for CIROND, 4 channels, 802.11b...) > > warning that though it is acceptable with CCK, it might create problems > > with OFDM! > > > > Philippe > > > > > > ---------------------------------- > > Philippe Hanset > > University of Tennessee, Knoxville > > Office of Information Technology > > Network Services > > 108 James D Hoskins Library > > 1400 Cumberland Ave > > Knoxville, TN 37996 > > Tel: 1-865-9746555 > > ---------------------------------- > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Urrea, Nick wrote: > > > > > We have a large study room at UC Hastings which accommodates up to 150 > > > students. > > > > > > On average I see about 80-100 users using the wifi in the room. > > > > > > To load balance the wifi in the room I have setup 4 APs. > > > > > > Right now we use the 3 non-overlapping 2.4ghz channels, 1, 6, and 11. > > > > > > The 4 APs are line of sight with each. > > > > > > Do you think it would be a good idea to go to 4 channels instead 3 > > > > > > Ex: (1, 4, 8, 11) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > Nicholas Urrea > > > > > > Information Technology > > > > > > UC Hastings College of the Law > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > x4718 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ********** > > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > > > > > > ********** > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > > > > > ********** > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > ********** > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
