Contrary to this thread, we are running 4.2.112 on 14 WiSM controllers without any noticeable difficulty - no memory leaks and no complaints of random disconnects. We have these divided into two roaming domains, one for general campus use and one for ResNet (they pay for their stuff out of a different budget and also get different rules on what they can do).
-jcw ------------------------------------- John Watters UA: OIT 205-348-3992 _____ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Controller Manoj, I'm so glad you mentioned it. I thought we were the only ones. We run 4.2.130 also and have the same issue. We've been working with TAC for the past two months and they still can't figure out what causes that behavior. Louisiana State University Hector Rios From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manoj Abeysekera Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 1:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Controller Mike, We run 4.2.130. I was told by Cisco Engineer to downgrade to this version as we had a nightmare with 5.x. However we still get Clients disconnected at random intervals(Radio seems to reset somehow forcing clients to roam to nearby LAP's). Cisco has no clue and i wonder why not many people have called them yet. WLC's 4404 AP's 1230 Open Network Let me know if you find a cure.. Good Luck! Manoj American U. Mike King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> 10/08/2008 02:44 PM Please respond to The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Controller So Cisco LWAPP people, Currently we're on 4.1.185.0 <http://4.1.185.0/> . It's a 4402 controller, with 1131AG access points. Anyone made the leap to one of the 4.2, 5.0 , or 5.1 trains without seriously regretting it? We've had some random disconnects with clients. It's pretty common, happening to most all users. We're running WPA-PSK, so it's not an 802.1x issue. Before we involve TAC, we figured we should upgrade to a new code train. Mike ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. <http://www.educause.edu/groups/> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
