The warning for the 5.0 code train is real, we had a horrible experience with it. I have heard OK things about 5.1, but the same caveats are there from 5.0, so we opted not to install it. We are currently running 4.2.130 across 6 WiSMs and waiting for 5.2 as well.
We have 4 location servers and beta tested the MSE 3350. Go for MSE 3350 if you have the option; higher tracked element limit (up to 18,000 through licensing) and the hardware is an actual server (2 Processors, RAID1 , dual power supplies, etc). Hope this helps, Ryan Kocsondy | Network Technician 3 University of Connecticut | UITS - Network Engineering 369 Fairfield Way - Unit 2209 | Storrs, CT 06269 T 860 486 8346 | F 860 486 6580 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WALLACE, DAVID Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Location Appliance and Controller Code 5.X train. Issue 1-->Here at Kent State we have just under 1200 ap's on 25 controllers. With the time involved we are looking at possibly upgrading from the 4.2.130 code to the 5.X code train. Upon are migration to the lite weight architecture we were warned off of the 5.X train. I have not heard of anyone locally running it yet, looking for some feedback and analysis. Issue 2--> Is there anyone on the list running multiple location appliances and could we have some feedback. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
