We've just rolled out a single WLC running 5.1 code. No issues yet but we're deployed in a single residence complex....ie.....not a high density user area nor a lot of roaming. Yes, we were dissuaded from 5.0 but were led to understand that 5.1 isn't bad (and it's not been so far in this scenario)
James Savage York University Senior Communications Tech. 108 Steacie Building [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4700 Keele Street ph: 416-736-2100 ext. 22605 Toronto, Ontario fax: 416-736-5701 M3J 1P3, CANADA "WALLACE, DAVID" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> 12/01/2008 11:57 AM Please respond to The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Location Appliance and Controller Code 5.X train. Issue 1-->Here at Kent State we have just under 1200 ap's on 25 controllers. With the time involved we are looking at possibly upgrading from the 4.2.130 code to the 5.X code train. Upon are migration to the lite weight architecture we were warned off of the 5.X train. I have not heard of anyone locally running it yet, looking for some feedback and analysis. Issue 2--> Is there anyone on the list running multiple location appliances and could we have some feedback. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
