Same here.
Douglas R. Bentley University Information Technology Systems Engineering Group 727 Elmwood Avenue, Suite 132 Rochester, NY 14620 Office: (585) 275-6550 Fax: (585) 273-1013 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rochester.edu/its/ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roth, Joe Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 10:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM Leo, We had a meeting with a Cisco wireless SE to discuss some things that we had going on here. We are running 5.0 without any issues, which surprised him because their recommendation is to either run 4.2 or 5.1 and avoid 5.0 and 4.1 altogether. I don’t have any examples or data to back his claim, but this is what we were told. --Joe ________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of leo song Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 8:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM thanks all your replies. 3 confident votes to 4.1.112.0 3 confident votes to 4.2.130.0 - Leo Song, Cluster Lead - Networking and Security (519) 824-4120 x 53181 CCS, University of Guelph On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 09:11 -0500, Bentley, Douglas wrote: Leo, We are running (8 WiSMs) 4.2.130 with GREAT improvement over 4.1.185 (Crashing all the time for us too). We are also testing 5.1.151 (Which seems stable) but without the real load of our production network. Douglas R. Bentley University Information Technology Systems Engineering Group 727 Elmwood Avenue, Suite 132 Rochester, NY 14620 Office: (585) 275-6550 Fax: (585) 273-1013 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rochester.edu/its/ -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd M. Hall Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM Not sure what you mean by the prolong crash, but when we were running 4.1.x and older code, we had random crashes, sometimes multiple controllers would crash at the same time. Turns out there was a bug in the ssh code on the controllers. Turned off ssh and no more problems (controllers were in a private network, so this wasn't a problem for us). We are currently running 4.2.61 which has been very stable. On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Leo Song wrote: > Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:32:27 -0500 > From: Leo Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM > > Hi, folks. > > Which WiSM code are you running, 4.1.185 (we are), 4.2.173 or 4.2.130, etc, > etc? we've been suffering the prolong crash bug, the response from Cisco is > not promising, thanks. > > > Leo Song, Cluster Lead - Networking and Security > (519) 824-4120 x 53181 CCS, University of Guelph > > ********** > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > -- Todd M. Hall Sr. Network Analyst Information Technology Infrastructure Mississippi State University [EMAIL PROTECTED] 662-325-9311 (phone) ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
<<image001.jpg>>
