-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 11:06 -0300 9/30/2009, Matt Ashfield wrote: >In light of this article I'm wondering if anyone is still sticking with >TKIP (for legacy system issues I would guess) as opposed to using AES >solely? >
When we rolled out 802.1X and WPA2, we specifically decided to go with AES-CCMP exclusively as opposed to running both TKIP and AES-CCMP concurrently. The primary reason was reducing complexity and helping with troubleshooting, but we're definitely happy we made the decision now. :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 9.9.1.287 wj8DBQFKw2osDlQHnMkeAWMRAqFlAJ9aYjvh03bKNM6lXEBjkzv/NauijwCfV6le PII9uEXcGXrc/0dr3lI2cvQ= =p4dr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Julian Y. Koh <mailto:[email protected]> Manager, Network Transport <phone:847-467-5780> Telecommunications and Network Services Northwestern University PGP Public Key:<http://bt.ittns.northwestern.edu/julian/pgppubkey.html> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
