-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi David,
On 05/01/2010 20:13, David France wrote: > We are contemplating employing central authentication/local switching > for 1 802.1x TTLS/AES/TKIP SSID, and locally switching 1 WPAPSK SSID > and 1 SSID without encryption or L2 authentication. > The reason for using > HREAP would be to centralize the controllers without seriously impacting > the WAN. We've started to look at HREAP as well, and initial very small scale tests show it works fine. We've not yet: a) gone into the management side of things which you mention (HREAP groups) but we already automate AP group management for SSID propagation so I imagine it would be along similar lines. b) or done any roaming tests. So I'd also be grateful for any feedback on how that performs. We are actually using HREAP to avoid hairpinning local LANs to the controllers in the backbone, not for service survivability in the case of loss of controller. Hence us using 802.1X authN on the locally switched SSIDs is not going to be a problem. As I say any feedback at all from HREAP users out there would be welcome! regards, - -- Oliver Gorwits, Network and Telecommunications Group, Oxford University Computing Services -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktGN4kACgkQ2NPq7pwWBt6GqgCgrrhwE3BR5zggYgRDr2OAUB3R crgAoMEyJtqAubuNukkfVXpbouH7hXfT =86Cu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
