Hey Mike, I didn't know 6.0.196 was released. I just checked it out, and 6.0.196 is AssureWave. This is one of the point releases that Cisco releases that has had extensive testing with multiple devices / vendors / software products. It's similar to the old "Safe Harbor" release. Here's the doc to it: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns779/networking_solutions_program_category_home.html The test results actually show the test methodolgy, and it's pretty extensive. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns779/AssureWave-WLC-Release-6.0.196.0-Results.pdf
It also gives a list of Bugs (at the end) that the testers felt should be considered before upgrading <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns779/networking_solutions_program_category_home.html> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Schomer, Michael J. < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > > We are noticing a problem on our WPA/802.1x SSID with some of our clients > after a recent Cisco WLC upgrade from 5.2.178 to 6.0.188. The clients are > able to connect and authenticate to the SSID; however, they aren’t receiving > an IP address. We have ruled out the DHCP server as the problem. This > doesn’t affect all clients, and the problem seems to come and go. We > haven’t seen a common OS or chipset among the clients that are having > problems. > > > > We currently are running four WLCs in production, and all of them received > the upgrade at the same time. The only thing that most of these clients > have in common is that they are associated to APs on two particular > controllers. The only thing unique about those two controllers is that they > have mostly 1131 APs. When the clients roam to a different WLC, they can > usually connect just fine. > > > > I’m at a loss right now. We did test the 6.0.188 code in one building > (with 1250 APs) for several months before deploying it, without any notable > issues. We are now potentially looking at downgrading back to 5.2 code, but > aren’t thrilled about it. Another option would be to upgrade to 6.0.196, > but we haven’t done any testing of that code revision. > > > > Has anyone seen a similar issue? Does anyone know of any issues with > 6.0.188 code and 1131 APs? Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > -Mike Schomer > > -St. Cloud State University > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
