I do not stack our Procurve core switches, so I would like to setup 2 lacp groups on the 4404's and have 2 ports go to one core and the other 2 ports go to the other core.
Instead I have to have all 4 ports go to one switch and have 3 controllers on each switch. Thank you, Lee Weers Central College Assistant Director for Network Services 641-628-7675 -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Sessler Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 6:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Controller Feature Gaps Lee, If you have a stack of Cisco switches, say a pair of 3750G's connected via stackwise, you can split the trunks between the two. on something like a 6509, the ports can be split between line cards (that's what I'm doing with my 5508's). Push out templates - can't this be done via the "controller groups" function in WCS. Create a group of one, select all the templates from the templates tab, then apply them to the new controller. Jeff >>> Lee Weers <[email protected]> 4/23/2010 11:58 AM >>> I would like to be able to setup lacp differently so that it can be split between two switches. Then LACP doesn’t truly work unless a gbic is inserted in port 1. I haven’t tried pulling the port1 gbic to see if the controller still maintains connectivity or not. It will not establish connectivity on boot, unless a gbic is in port 1 (this is for 4404 controllers). Version 7 and 5508 only feature that is currently lacking is the remote office capability. I would like to see better integration between wcs and the controllers. There are still to many things to go to each controller to configure. WCS needs to be able to push out templates better for bringing in a new controller. I would like to push out a master template, not have to go into each sub template and apply it separately. I occasionally still find a template not applied to a controller. Thank you, Lee Weers Central College Assistant Director for Network Services 641-628-7675 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike King Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Controller Feature Gaps I was asked this today, and I didn't have a good answer, looking from other Cisco Wireless Controller users to help me formulate a good response. What features do you find lacking in the wireless LAN controller that are available in other products? What is a major source of discontent with the product. What feature do you wish the product has I know I have one major source of discontent, the separate mesh releases (which have finally be re-intergrated in the 6.0 release) What have you guys got? ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
