John, Yea Apple isn't always the best at providing detailed stats. The iPhone 4 
does do .11n in the 2.4GHz space with a 1x1 antenna (at least as far as I've 
seen). There should be a bit of performance increase over the older models due 
to a few efficiencies with 11n. We haven't run any detailed tests ourselves, 
but so far haven't seen any real issues. Also I've published some of our wifi 
usage stats (including iPhone) to my blog at 
www.freshlymobile.com<http://www.freshlymobile.com> (click on UW Mobile stats 
at the top for the most recent look).

Take care

David



David Morton
Director, Mobile Communication Strategies
University of Washington
dmor...@u.washington.edu<mailto:dmor...@u.washington.edu>
tel 206.221.7814


----------------------------------------------
www.freshlymobile.com
                  a fresh look at mobility
----------------------------------------------

On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:03 AM, <j...@nww.com<mailto:j...@nww.com>> wrote:

Stan,

What kind of 11n data rates and throughput are you seeing in the 2.4 band?

Also, I think iPhone 4 has only a single Wi-Fi antenna, so it doesn't benefit 
(or benefit as much) as a 2x2 or 3x3 MIMO laptop. Have you done any i4 
performance metrics?

I'm trying to get 11n implementation details from Apple, but so far they've 
only referred me to the Web i4 spec sheet.

Regards,
John Cox
Senior Editor
Network World

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Brooks, Stan
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:00 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?

John,

At Emory University, we’ve just completed upgrading our ResHalls to 802.11n and 
are now working on our academic buildings as part of a system-wide upgrade to 
802.11n.  We’ve moved from single radio b/g  APs to dual radio a/b/g/n APs.  We 
are running 802.11n (backwards compatible to b/g) on our 2.4GHz radios, but 
without the 40MHz (high-throughput) channel plan.  In fact I (and most wireless 
engineers) would advise against running 40MHz channels at 2.4GHz.  We do run 
the 40MHz channels in the 5GHz band, however.

That said, 802.11n with standard 20MHz channels does give marked improvement 
over 802.11b/g because of other dot11n technologies – multiple special streams, 
frame aggregation, etc.

 >>-> Stan Brooks - CWNA/CWSP
      Emory University
      University Technology Services
      404.727.0226
AIM/Y!/Twitter: WLANstan
           MSN: wlans...@hotmail.com<mailto:wlans...@hotmail.com>
    GoogleTalk: wlans...@gmail.com<mailto:wlans...@gmail.com>

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of 
j...@nww.com<mailto:j...@nww.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:08 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?

Chris,

Thanks. Your observation on 40Mhz limiting the channel options in 2.4 band fits 
with what I've learned also.

As I mentioned in my direct reply, your email reminded me -- and I should have 
thought of this -- that of course the same 3-channel "limitation" exists for 
11b/g iPhones.

But…what I'm wondering is if the iPhone 4's demand or preference for 11n makes 
the situation more problematic, especially in a mixed-client environment -- 
when b/g iPhones are associating to the same 11n access point?

Regards,
John Cox
Senior Editor
Network World

From: Chris Murphy [mailto:ch...@mit.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 7:28 PM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Cc: John Cox
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?

John,

I don't think there is much of an issue here, unless there is a requirement 
that the iPhone 4's need the bandwidth possible using 40Mhz channels.  Just 
about every design guideline I've seen, and every conversation I've had with 
engineers at various networking companies, considers using 40Mhz channels at 
2.4Ghz to be a bad idea, due to the loss of what little flexibility one has 
with channel layout as well as with adverse effects on neighboring networks in 
crowded areas (the "anti-social" effect), so here at least we never considered 
it.

-Chris

On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:12 AM, <j...@nww.com<mailto:j...@nww.com>> 
<j...@nww.com<mailto:j...@nww.com>> wrote:

Folks,

I was talking to a higher education IT guy last week; they have a lot of 
iPhones, and are rollling out iPhone 4's to new freshman and to faculty. As 
part of this, they upgraded the campus WLAN to 802.11n.

BUT, after iPhone 4 was announced, they realized its 11n support was ONLY for 
the 2.4 GHz band (with of course only 3 non-overlapping channels, and tradeoffs 
if you merge two of them into one 40MHz channel).

In SOME locations, they're having to do some fancy juggling of access points, 
channel and power settings.

Juggling 3 channels in a crowded location clearly is NOT new. But the fact that 
this is occurring in 11n with a popular client device that often relies on WLAN 
access, seems noteworthy.

I was wondering if anyone else is running into similar issues with iPhone 4 and 
11n?

I'm going to be writing this up as a "Network World" story today or early 
Tuesday. If you're interested in emailing/talking briefly with me about this, 
please just copy any listserv response to (or email me directly at) my NW 
email: john_...@nww.com<mailto:john_...@nww.com>.

Thanks!

Regards,
John Cox
______________________________________________________

J o h n   C o x
Senior Editor
Main: 508.766.5301 | Direct: 508.766.5422
Office at home: 978-834-0554

NETWORKWORLD
Maximize Your Return on IT
492 Old Connecticut Path | Framingham, MA 01701-9002
______________________________________________________
NetworkWorld.com<http://www.networkworld.com/> | 2009 Media 
Guide<http://www.networkworld.com/media/> | Conferences and 
Events<http://www.networkworld.com/events/>


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found 
athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.


===========================================
Chris Murphy
Network Engineer
MIT Information Services & Technology
Room W92-191
77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA  02139
ch...@mit.edu<mailto:ch...@mit.edu>

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

________________________________
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to