Bruce,

We face the same issue.
So far we have solved it by deciding to continue to use b/g outdoor while 
waiting
for an outdoor/enclosed 802.11n (antenna and AP embedded in one "elegant" metal 
box) :(
This said, the cost of enclosed outdoor APs is really high
compared to indoor APs with outdoor antennas.
Aruba has a outdoor MIMO antenna that doesn't look too bad (doesn't require two 
antennas and supports 2.4 and 5),
but you still have to deal with 3 cables: AP-ANT-17 or AP-ANT-92.
http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/products/ap-ant-17_ss.pdf
http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/products/ap-ant-92_ss.pdf
(connector works with non-Aruba hardware!)

Though we would rather standardize our 802.11n offering, we have also noticed 
that
outdoor wireless is more about coverage than bandwidth, and b/g seems to be 
fine.

Philippe Hanset
University of TN


On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Entwistle, Bruce wrote:

We are currently looking at different ways to cover outdoor areas as we look to 
migrate to N wireless.  In our existing B/G installation we have installed APs 
inside buildings and run coaxial cable to antennas located on strategic 
positions on the outside of the building.  However as we look to installing N 
APs the idea of two antennas and six cables on the outside of the building does 
not seem aesthetically pleasing.  I would appreciate anyone who is willing to 
share their experience with a similar situation.

Thank you
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to