I think Legacy Licenses was a specific type of license for customers for when WCS switched to the PLUS and the BASE designations. If you notice it says end of sale 2009.
I don't there there is a published EOS/EOL yet. On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Michael Cole <mc...@clarku.edu> wrote: > The legacy license info for EOS/EOL is here:**** > > ** ** > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5755/ps6301/ps6305/end_of_life_c51-556750.html > **** > > ** ** > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Moore, Brandon > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 05, 2011 3:13 PM > > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS**** > > ** ** > > Has anyone heard a possible time frame for the End of Sale/Support for WCS > yet? **** > > ** ** > > Thanks, **** > > ** ** > > *Brandon Moore* > > *Network Analyst***** > > *ITCS- Network Engineering* > > *East Carolina University* > > *[image: MCj03234030000[1]]** * > > *mail to: moo...@ecu.edu* > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *David Jaremowicz > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 05, 2011 1:52 PM > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS**** > > ** ** > > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > I was a beta tester for NCS. I liked it a lot. Easier navigation, more > intuitive searches, more clear alerts/events. Basic switch monitoring is > nice for tier1 help desk, but monitoring switches utilizes the same license > allocations as APs. It “feels” a lot like WCS, so you don’t have to learn a > whole new interface.**** > > ** ** > > For me, one of the nicest features is the soft appliance option (ESX OVA > install). Our WCS sits on a “managed” linux box. A whole other group is > responsible for the OS/hardware. Troubleshooting with TAC could be a > nightmare. With NCS running on a soft appliance, it eliminates the need for > a sysadmin – easier to work with TAC.**** > > ** ** > > Also, NCS uses Oracle for the DB. In beta it seemed to be more stable. > Also, the report limitations (like the >100k record error) have been lifted. > **** > > ** ** > > We still have WCS for our production environment, but will be pricing out > the NCS upgrade shortly.**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > ** ** > > David Jaremowicz**** > > Network Engineer**** > > IT Services - University of Chicago**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Lee H Badman > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:14 PM > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS**** > > ** ** > > Have any WCS shops yet migrated to NCS? Any thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks-**** > > ** ** > > Lee**** > > ** ** > > Lee H. Badman**** > > Wireless/Network Engineer**** > > Information Technology and Services**** > > Adjunct Instructor, iSchool**** > > Syracuse University**** > > 315 443-3003**** > > **** > > **** > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. **** > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. **** > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. **** > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
<<image001.png>>
