Back in the bad old 4.0 code days (4 + years ago), I hit a bug when more
than 25 people associated to an access point, it would spontaneously reboot.

See if you can see a correlation in WCS, look for number of associations,
number of rouge clients, number of rouge AP's.

Mike

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Mike Goebel <[email protected]>wrote:

> How big are your subnets the APs reside on, and how is your latency from
> the controllers to the APs? I know the APs are latency sensitive.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 1/31/2012 8:44 AM, Scott Smith wrote:
>
>> We installed around 700 over the summer in our residence halls as well.
>>
>> I've seen the same issue. However we've never had WCS until the same
>> project. I'm starting to wonder as well.
>>
>> Yup....it's a Droid !!!
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2012 7:39 AM, "Dan Brisson" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>    I'm curious if any Cisco users out there are experiencing or have
>>    experienced what we're seeing on our campus.  This past summer we
>>    installed 3502i's in all of our residence halls - approximately 500
>>    total.  Ever since the students have moved in, we will get messages
>>    from WCS stating that "AP XYZ" is down and disassociated from the
>>    controller.  When I check out the AP, the uptime is fine, but the
>>    "CAPWAP join time" is for like 30 seconds, or however long it took
>>    me to check.
>>
>>    We've tracked this and it is totally random as to what AP will drop,
>>    which makes troubleshooting this very tough.  The log on the AP
>>    isn't helpful.  I'm working with TAC who suggests that keepalives
>>    are getting missed.  I'm not sure why that would be the case since
>>    we have another 500 or so APs on the admin side that very rarely
>>    drop.  Adding to that, when the students left for break, the AP
>>    drops stopped.  They came back, and sure enough, the drops start up
>>    again.
>>
>>    I will say that the AP always joins back immediately, but for the
>>    time that it does drop A) I'm sure connectivity is affected in that
>>    area and B) we get an email.
>>
>>    Anyone experiencing this?
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>    -dan
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Dan Brisson
>>    Network Engineer
>>    University of Vermont
>>    (Ph) 802.656.8111 <tel:802.656.8111>
>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>    **********
>>    Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>    Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
>>    http://www.educause.edu/__**groups/<http://www.educause.edu/__groups/><
>> http://www.educause.edu/**groups/ <http://www.educause.edu/groups/>>.
>>
>>
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
>> http://www.educause.edu/**groups/ <http://www.educause.edu/groups/>.
>>
>>
> --
> Mike Goebel
> Network Programmer
> Office of Information Technology
> Western Michigan University
> Phone: 269-387-0453
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at 
> http://www.educause.edu/**groups/<http://www.educause.edu/groups/>
> .
>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to