I'm quite surprised that people are experiencing too many devices per ap, as 
that implies either incredibly dense student packing, or a relatively small 
number of access points in an area.

We've seen some remarkably attenuating walls and floors, but given contruction 
details (or best guess given age), that can be overcome. We don't expect 
through-floor propagation in any modern structure, due to the wrinkly-tin 
floors, but we also discovered that one of our buildings was once an X-Ray 
clinic ;)

I'm personally not keen on putting equipment into student rooms, as getting 
back in when it goes wrong tends to be a challenge, as it's ever more onerous 
getting access.

So, what can we do about rogue devices? Suggestions on the back of an estwing 
fire-ax please.

--
ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Y Koh
Sent:  24/02/2013, 17:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Residence Hall Wireless survey

On Feb 22, 2013, at 14:00 , Julian Y Koh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> OK, there's no need for everyone to respond - as I wrote before, we're going 
> to be sending the total/aggregate results to the entire list.  :)

And here we are!  Total of 56 responses.  Here are the highlights.  Please post 
any additional questions here and I'll see if any of the data will help.  
Thanks again to everyone!!


1.) Primary equipment vendor:
        Cisco   55.4%
        Aruba   26.8%
        Meru     7.1%
        Juniper  5.4%

2.) Initial AP placements:
        Hallways/Common Areas           94.6%
        Individual Resident Rooms        5.4%

3.) Experiencing issues?
        Yes     85.7%
        No      14.3%

4.) Kinds of problems?
        Too many client devices per AP  64.6%
        Rogue wireless devices          58.3%
        High signal attenuation         45.8%
        Low signal attenuation          14.6%

5.) Options considered to address issues?
        Adding APs              84.6%
        Relocation APs          73.1%
        Changing Vendors        17.3%

6.) New AP placements:
        Individual Resident Rooms       68.0%
        Hallways/Common Areas           46.0%

7.) Mount types:
        Ceilings                89.1%
        Walls                   34.5%
        Embedded Wall Boxes     10.9%

8.) Success at remediation?
        Very Successful         45.2%
        Moderately Successful   31.0%
        Not Successful           2.4%

--
Julian Y. Koh
Manager, Network Transport, Telecommunications and Network Services
Northwestern University Information Technology (NUIT)
2001 Sheridan Road #G-166
Evanston, IL 60208
847-467-5780
NUIT Web Site: <http://www.it.northwestern.edu/>
PGP Public Key:<http://bt.ittns.northwestern.edu/julian/pgppubkey.html>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to