Ok, 3 per person is about what we see too, but then we've an ap:student ratio 
of approx 1:9, and some places are 1:6 (it worked out that way due to the 
construction) The AP's are dual-band too. We disable the slowest rates, 
encouraging devices to actually be connected to the nearest ap, rather than 
'the one they saw first'. Most of the ap's are at half power too, as we saw it 
as a density over coverage situation.

What ap:student ratio are others running?

Thanks
--
ian

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Sweetser
Sent:  24/02/2013, 18:31
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Residence Hall Wireless survey

High density doesn't surprise me very much.  We try to track general student
wireless device, and this last year and this we had a decent amount (I forget
the percentage, but it was non-trivial) that had three wireless devices per
person - a laptop, table, and smart phone each.  Throw in a wireless game
console or media device, and you can easily have far more devices than people.
  The fact that many of them are always-on, low power, and low speed is just
an added bonus.

As for rogue devices, banning all wireless printers would be a good start...

Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu    |  For every problem, there is a solution that
Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute |           - HL Mencken

On 2/24/2013 1:27 PM, Ian McDonald wrote:
> I'm quite surprised that people are experiencing too many devices per ap,
> as that implies either incredibly dense student packing, or a relatively
> small number of access points in an area.
>
> We've seen some remarkably attenuating walls and floors, but given
> contruction details (or best guess given age), that can be overcome. We
> don't expect through-floor propagation in any modern structure, due to the
> wrinkly-tin floors, but we also discovered that one of our buildings was
> once an X-Ray clinic ;)
>
> I'm personally not keen on putting equipment into student rooms, as getting
> back in when it goes wrong tends to be a challenge, as it's ever more
> onerous getting access.
>
> So, what can we do about rogue devices? Suggestions on the back of an
> estwing fire-ax please.
>
> -- ian -----Original Message----- From: Julian Y Koh Sent:  24/02/2013,
> 17:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
> Residence Hall Wireless survey
>
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 14:00 , Julian Y Koh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> OK, there's no need for everyone to respond - as I wrote before, we're
>> going to be sending the total/aggregate results to the entire list.  :)
>
> And here we are!  Total of 56 responses.  Here are the highlights.  Please
> post any additional questions here and I'll see if any of the data will
> help.  Thanks again to everyone!!
>
>
> 1.) Primary equipment vendor: Cisco   55.4% Aruba   26.8% Meru     7.1%
> Juniper  5.4%
>
> 2.) Initial AP placements: Hallways/Common Areas           94.6% Individual
> Resident Rooms        5.4%
>
> 3.) Experiencing issues? Yes     85.7% No      14.3%
>
> 4.) Kinds of problems? Too many client devices per AP  64.6% Rogue wireless
> devices          58.3% High signal attenuation         45.8% Low signal
> attenuation          14.6%
>
> 5.) Options considered to address issues? Adding APs              84.6%
> Relocation APs          73.1% Changing Vendors        17.3%
>
> 6.) New AP placements: Individual Resident Rooms       68.0%
> Hallways/Common Areas           46.0%
>
> 7.) Mount types: Ceilings                89.1% Walls
> 34.5% Embedded Wall Boxes     10.9%
>
> 8.) Success at remediation? Very Successful         45.2% Moderately
> Successful   31.0% Not Successful           2.4%
>
> -- Julian Y. Koh Manager, Network Transport, Telecommunications and Network
> Services Northwestern University Information Technology (NUIT) 2001
> Sheridan Road #G-166 Evanston, IL 60208 847-467-5780 NUIT Web Site:
> <http://www.it.northwestern.edu/> PGP Public
> Key:<http://bt.ittns.northwestern.edu/julian/pgppubkey.html>
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to