It's not that it's invalid, but we just can't (shouldn't) enforce it
using our radios. We can enforce it politically (grievances against
people who refuse to remove the APs).

--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBRH M-9B
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure

I am part of the UAH Safe Zone LGBTQIA support network:
http://www.uah.edu/student-affairs/safe-zone


On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Brian Helman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just saw this on CNN and jumped on the list to post. Using your own AP is
> against the AUP everyone signs at our institution. Now I wonder if that
> clause is invalid.
>
> -Brian
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S4. Tiny keyboards=typing mistakes. Verify anything
> sent.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Sweetser <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 3:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] It would seem FCC just declared WLAN quarantine
> features illegal
>
> I think a good chunk of the use is even more insidious than that.  I've been
> in a position where I've offered university guests access to our wifi.  A
> number of these users - smart, highly technical IT professionals - instead
> just said "Nah, I'll just use my hotspot."
>
> I suspect it's a combination of two things.  First, "I paid for it, so I
> have
> to use it to get my money's worth".  Second, "I'd have to think about how to
> set up a new wifi, or I can just turn on my hotspot by rote memory."
>
> In both cases, the cost (or lack thereof) and quality of any host offered
> wifi
> doesn't even factor into the decision at all.
>
> Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu    |  For every problem, there is a solution
> that
> Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
> Worcester Polytechnic Institute |           - HL Mencken
>
> On 10/3/2014 3:21 PM, Philippe Hanset wrote:
>> Everything would be so much simpler if locations would provide Wi-Fi for
>> free
>> or at a reasonable price.
>> When a technology is used by everyone (e.g. Electricity) like Wi-Fi, just
>> include it in the cost of doing business.
>> Stop charging users for Wi-Fi, especially when the room is already at
>> $200+/night. People will bring their own Mi-Fi or smartphone-hotspot,
>> and bypass the silly cost model!
>>
>> At Educause this week the Vendor-floor was plagued with hundreds of Mi-Fi
>> and
>> private Wi-Fi.
>> The event was charging upward of $150/day for Wi-Fi to exhibitors. So,
>> many of
>> them had their own solutions!
>>
>> Humans are resourceful...and if you piss them off they will read the law
>> and
>> call the FCC (or they pirate your network ;-)
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>> Philippe Hanset
>> www.eduroam.us <http://www.eduroam.us>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 3, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Lee H Badman <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What do you all think of this?
>>>
>>> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/after-blocking-personal-hotspot-at-hotel-marriott-to-pay-fcc-600000/
>>>
>>> - Lee Badman
>>
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
>> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to