I think you could accomplish the same consumer friendly setup in
classrooms, labs, etc. and still provide meet your goals including
regulatory compliance. I see this sort of hybrid approach today in
hospital settings, so I'm not sure why it can't be accomplished in EDU.
The new Kaiser hospital in my area has free WiFi everywhere, secure wifi
for all their mobile computer stations (one per room), EKGs, pumps, etc.
mesh-based location solution with tags on everything, and cellular
distribution. 
 
I would also question setting highest performance as a goal. What you
want is a solution that provides the user what they need at the moment
they need it. I didn't deploy 802.11n or 802.11ac so that I could win
unrealistic max performance claims. I deployed those technologies to
support more efficient access to a finite amount of spectrum. And if
performance is a goal, it's going to be more difficult to attain if the
access to the service is complex enough to make the typical user reach
for their MiFi device.
 
Jeff 

>>> On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 9:44 AM, in message
<[email protected]>, Lee H Badman
<[email protected]> wrote:


No easy answer. The dorms could be set up “consumer style” with a
different operational profile, SSID, etc and don’t HAVE to be run like
the rest of campus. 
 
But in classrooms, labs and meeting rooms there is now way to deliver
highest performance, regulatory compliance, and accommodation of crap
devices all at the same time without hyper complexity, and then at the
physics level you still have problems.  
 
Even if every issue can’t be fixed in one fell swoop, there are a
number of easy tweaks that device makers could provide if they pulled
their heads out of 2004.
 

Lee Badman
Wireless/Network Architect
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003
(Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com) 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey
Sessler
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Trying to get the Wi-Fi Alliance's
Attention

 

I don't know Lee, in my mind is it the device maker's requirements to
work in both consumer and enterprise environment, or does the enterprise
wlan market need to figure out how to look more like a consumer wlan? Is
this a problem EDU's have created because of some desire to provide a
service that's more complex or invasive to use then it has to be? Is
there really a need to on-board devices and have them associate using
WPA2 Ent, or could we support the bulk of our users (especially
students) using something more consumer friendly?

 

Take residential (dorm) wifi as an example. If you had a model with an
open or PSK-emulated wireless network coupled with location-based
service filtering, the user gets on with every device out there, and
they can see their chromecast, appletv, etc. and any others on that AP
or 1 adjacent. Pretty much gives you the consumer feel.

 

Jeff

>>> On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 11:47 AM, in message
<[email protected]>, Lee H Badman
<[email protected]> wrote:


I know self-promotion is in poor taste, but wanted to share this 
 
http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless-infrastructure/the-case-for-wlan-interoperability/a/d-id/1318718?​

 
and encourage anyone of like (or opposing) mind to add comments. I'm
told that the Alliance is at least reading along, FWIW.
 
-Lee

 

Lee H. Badman
Network Architect/Wireless TME
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to