I found that when I was standing on a ladder with ceiling tile dust in my hair, 
my success rate with a punch down tool was much better than with a crimper.  
That was when I had hair...now I let the younger guys do it ;-)
John

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nocifore,Matthew
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 9:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Copper Cable Field Terminations for Access Points

Hi Mark.

We feel that the investment in the cable plant, which has a much longer life 
expectancy than the APs, is worthy of  "proper" termination and labeling.  
Drexel is currently on its 4th replacement cycle of APs and based on changing 
equipment sizes and antenna characteristics we have had to adjust AP locations 
many times.  In some replacement cycles we have replaced our short length patch 
cords between AP and jack, sometimes due to the bends forced on the cables by 
the RJ location on the APs or other wear and tear.

We did have internal  discussion as you are having now before we expanded 
density in our dorms. Even in cases where we pull a cable out of an existing 
wire stations and move it up to ceiling height (as we have done frequently in 
our dorms) we still terminate the cable in a jack.

The other important factor for us was maintaining a demarcation point to 
separate CPE from the wire plant.  Particularly when working with other 
department's contractors.    This will likely be increasingly important as  the 
the Internet of Things used by University Facilities continues to expand.

In the case of access points where the network organization is responsible for 
both the access point and the cable plant, the staff  responsible for access 
point life cycle replacement (in-house without contracted labor) and  break-fix 
are different from the cable installers.   So even in our own organization we 
like the demarc segmentation.

Even as TIA supports RJ plug terminated cables -- personally I'm still 
concerned about the quality of work that happens when field terminating an RJ 
plug.  In new building construction, installer cable test results will not 
necessarily demonstrate that the installer managed to obtain proper strain 
relief in the RJ plug crimp.    And the thought of having to do a quality job 
replacing an RJ plug, standing on a ladder in an occupied office or dorm room 
seems very daunting in comparison to repairing or re-terminating a punch down 
connection.


Matt


Matthew Nocifore, Executive Director
Network Infrastructure & Telecommunications, CTI
Information Resources & Technology
Drexel University

E: [email protected]<x-msg://98/[email protected]>  T: 215-895-2828

On May 14, 2015 (Thu), at 1:05 PM, Mark H. Wehrle wrote:


Good afternoon all,

We are faced with some challenges in upgrading our access points in our 
residence halls this summer. Our existing installation has access points wall 
mounted and we terminate Cat5E cable on a Cat5E type biscuit jack on the wall 
near where the access point is mounted. From there we place a short cable from 
the jack to the access point. In current state, this makes for easier 
troubleshooting to decipher cable versus AP problems, however it's understood 
that there could be other problems associated with multiple termination points 
etc. In our current project, we are looking install access points with internal 
antennas and we are looking to move these to ceiling mounts in most/all of 
these rooms where we can. We made this choice because we've found that some 
students will vary the positions of antennas, which have impacted RF coverage 
and we have added more access points in some areas to compensate (we cannot 
easily get into student rooms to inspect access points).

The question I was asked before we move these jacks is whether we should save 
costs and time by just making a field termination of the Cat5E cable with an 
RJ45 connector crimped right on the cable then plug this cable directly into 
the access point and avoid the biscuit jack and short station cable. I'm 
wondering if anyone is doing this, was doing this and stopped, plans to do this 
etc? Does this present any problems like bad mechanical connection problems etc?

Thanks for your feedback.

--Mark Wehrle                                           Phone: (215) 898-9664
   Technical Director, ISC Network & Telecom Operations  Fax:     (215) 898-9348
   University of Pennsylvania
   3401 Walnut Suite 221a                           
Email:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
   Phila. PA 19104-6228

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to