Larry,
We have deployed 802.11ac WAPs in many locations, but only have 80mhz channels enabled sparingly around campus. My hope is that by having the SDR option, we could configure 2x 5ghz radios with either 20Mhz or 40Mhz channels, logically operating as 2 WAPs. Our wireless use case is primarily for internet access – we just don’t have a need for true wave1/2 802.11ac throughputs at this time. To see true Wave2 throughputs, I believe the client WNIC would need to be upgraded. If we could operate 2 “logical” 5ghz WAPs from a single unit for a small increase in price, I think this is where our greatest benefit would be at this time as you could in theory double the airtime available. This is based on several assumptions I am making – I have not gotten my hands on the new AP250 yet but I am actively looking to do so. http://boundless.aerohive.com/blog/Designing-WLANS-What-If-we-could-double-our-airtime-at-5-GHz.html Thanks, Chris Adams Director, Network & Telecom Services Division of Information Technology University of North Georgia From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry Dougher Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 2:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID? Chris, I have a question about the AP250, but may be a question about MU-MIMO more generally. So, all things being equal, would a 5Ghz 802.11ac device/client see any benefit from a Wave 2 AP or would that device/client have to have an upgraded/new 802.11ac 5Ghz Wave 2 chip to see a benefit? Thanks, Larry Dougher Chief Information Officer Information Technology Services <http://its.wsesu.net> Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union <http://wsesu.net> 127 State Street, Windsor, VT 05089 Email <mailto:[email protected]> | Google+ <http://goo.gl/gEAdt> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/larrydougher> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/larrydougher> | 802.674.8336 On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Chris Adams (IT) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I echo Jeremy’s sentiment – our experience with band-steering has been overwhelmingly positive. We are also not (currently) using DFS channels – but may be revisiting this soon. I’d estimate almost 2/3 of our 2.4ghz radios are disabled. I am very happy to see the new Aerohive AP250 has a SDR with the option of disabling the 2.4ghz radio in favor of having 2x 5ghz radios. Thanks, Chris Adams Director, Network & Telecom Services Division of Information Technology University of North Georgia From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Jeremy Gibbs Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:27 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID? I find the opposite to be true with band steering. If we turn it off, the majority of our clients won't connect to 5 Ghz, even if they are right above an AP. This causes lots of disconnect problems and congestion in the 2.4 Ghz spectrum. Turning band steering on fixes the problem for us. -- Jeremy L. Gibbs Sr. Network Engineer Utica College IITS On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Turner, Ryan H <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: All, This is probably a fool’s errand, but we are debating experimenting with turning off the 2.4 spectrum on our eduroam SSID on parts of campus that have a dense 5 gig coverage. We’ve always positioned eduroam as the premium SSID, and left a WPA2-PSK SSID for all the rest that don’t support advanced EAP methods. We are debating trying this in just the IT building to start (see how many people scream). Has anyone done anything like this? The goals would be to continually remove traffic from the garbage bands, hopefully increasing client performance. Band steering isn’t very good. Thanks, Ryan Turner The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
