We offer 2.4 and 5 GHz service.  When we have conflicts, we work with 
departments to give them a channel in the 2.4 GHz space, then we take that 
channel out of our central infrastructure.  So, for example we gave engineering 
channel 6 for all of their labs, and we took that out of our central 
infrastructure.  So far it has worked well and we can play together nicely ☺

Joe


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 9:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

I guess this brings up another good question, and that is, what is the 
percentage of 5GHz vs 2.4GHz you all see in your institutions? For us is still 
50-50. And it’s been like that for a while. I still see new laptops that only 
come with 2.4GHz adapters.

I would love to start turning off 2.4GHz in some areas of our campus, but I 
don’t think that’s an option for us at the moment.

[cid:[email protected]]

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Perry Correll
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:49 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

Chris,

Not ‘chuckling’, just smiling as we are actually glad to see other vendors 
supporting this capability. Today we are seeing 70, 80, 90, even up to 95% 
clients supporting 5Ghz capabilities and the advancement of SDR capabilities 
enables IT administrators to more efficiently and effectively address this 
evolution. However Wi-Fi in the 2.4Ghz spectrum isn’t going away anytime soon 
either

Best Regards,
Perry


Perry Correll  |  Xirrus Principal Technologist


o: 805 376 5437  |  m: 321 505 7726




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Adams (IT)
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 8:31 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

Kees,

I think your skepticism is well founded. We have many locations with multiple 
5ghz radios in the same room, but multiple 5ghz on the same device will be a 
more “uncharted” territory for our deployment. I am in the process of getting a 
few AP250 to throw into a few of our smaller auditoriums, which should be a 
good test of their performance.

I do believe that the channel width may be a differentiator in how well the 
deployment works – we are using 20mhz in most locations, which eliminates many 
of the spectrum and channel availability issues found with 40mhz+ channel 
widths.

PS: I’m sure some of the Xirrus guys are chuckling at this conversation as 
Xirrus has been well known for having large SDR arrays for many years now ☺

Thanks,

Chris Adams, CISSP

Director, Network & Telecom Services
Division of Information Technology
University of North Georgia

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kees Pronk
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 7:45 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

Hi Chris,

“you could in theory double the airtime available”

I would be interested in your actual experience with this. Now that a few 
vendors have taken this approach and others stay away from this.

Arguments in favor of 5/5 you will find these abundant on the vendors marketing 
pages, but how about :
Extra COGS (band pass filters etc), extra complexity with your channels plans 
(need a lot of separation between the 5/5 radios), you must enable DFS channels 
on every AP but what about false positive radar detects? What about the 2 
radio’s  ‘deafening’ each other while trying so send/receive at the same time.

Please keep us posted and maybe others testing with this

1.       Innovation

2.       Marketing gimmick
(pick one ;-)

Best regards, Kees

Van: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] Namens Larry Dougher
Verzonden: donderdag 7 april 2016 03:11
Aan: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

Thanks Chris!


Larry Dougher
Chief Information Officer
Information Technology Services<http://its.wsesu.net>
Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union<http://wsesu.net>
127 State Street, Windsor, VT 05089
Email<mailto:[email protected]> | Google+<http://goo.gl/gEAdt> | 
Twitter<http://twitter.com/larrydougher> | 
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/larrydougher> | 802.674.8336

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Chris Adams (IT) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Larry,

We have deployed 802.11ac WAPs in many locations, but only have 80mhz channels 
enabled sparingly around campus. My hope is that by having the SDR option, we 
could configure 2x 5ghz radios with either 20Mhz or 40Mhz channels, logically 
operating as 2 WAPs. Our wireless use case is primarily for internet access – 
we just don’t have a need for true wave1/2 802.11ac throughputs at this time.

To see true Wave2 throughputs, I believe the client WNIC would need to be 
upgraded. If we could operate 2 “logical” 5ghz WAPs from a single unit for a 
small increase in price, I think this is where our greatest benefit would be at 
this time as you could in theory double the airtime available.

This is based on several assumptions I am making – I have not gotten my hands 
on the new AP250 yet but I am actively looking to do so.

http://boundless.aerohive.com/blog/Designing-WLANS-What-If-we-could-double-our-airtime-at-5-GHz.html


Thanks,

Chris Adams

Director, Network & Telecom Services
Division of Information Technology
University of North Georgia

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Larry Dougher
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 2:28 PM

To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

Chris,

I have a question about the AP250, but may be a question about MU-MIMO more 
generally.  So, all things being equal, would a 5Ghz 802.11ac device/client see 
any benefit from a Wave 2 AP or would that device/client have to have an 
upgraded/new 802.11ac 5Ghz Wave 2 chip to see a benefit?

Thanks,


Larry Dougher
Chief Information Officer
Information Technology Services<http://its.wsesu.net>
Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union<http://wsesu.net>
127 State Street, Windsor, VT 05089
Email<mailto:[email protected]> | Google+<http://goo.gl/gEAdt> | 
Twitter<http://twitter.com/larrydougher> | 
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/larrydougher> | 
802.674.8336<tel:802.674.8336>

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Chris Adams (IT) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I echo Jeremy’s sentiment – our experience with band-steering has been 
overwhelmingly positive. We are also not (currently) using DFS channels – but 
may be revisiting this soon. I’d estimate almost 2/3 of our 2.4ghz radios are 
disabled.

I am very happy to see the new Aerohive AP250 has a SDR with the option of 
disabling the 2.4ghz radio in favor of having 2x 5ghz radios.

Thanks,

Chris Adams

Director, Network & Telecom Services
Division of Information Technology
University of North Georgia

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Jeremy Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:27 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Turning off 2.4 on a select SSID?

I find the opposite to be true with band steering.  If we turn it off, the 
majority of our clients won't connect to 5 Ghz, even if they are right above an 
AP.  This causes lots of disconnect problems and congestion in the 2.4 Ghz 
spectrum.  Turning band steering on fixes the problem for us.


--

Jeremy L. Gibbs
Sr. Network Engineer
Utica College IITS
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Turner, Ryan H 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
All,

This is probably a fool’s errand, but we are debating experimenting with 
turning off the 2.4 spectrum on our eduroam SSID on parts of campus that have a 
dense 5 gig coverage.  We’ve always positioned eduroam as the premium SSID, and 
left a WPA2-PSK SSID for all the rest that don’t support advanced EAP methods.  
We are debating trying this in just the IT building to start (see how many 
people scream).  Has anyone done anything like this?  The goals would be to 
continually remove traffic from the garbage bands, hopefully increasing client 
performance.  Band steering isn’t very good.

Thanks,
Ryan Turner
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
Disclaimer ( http://www.avans.nl/over-avans/e-mail-disclaimer )
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to