Hello,

Thanks for your response.


We are currently running our Wi-Fi environment on HP 860 Wi-Fi Controller 
configured for high availability failover, with approx. 92 access points of the 
model HP 460 and 466 and 560 spread across the campus. The campus is separated 
into 3 floors with 3 high density areas namely lecture hall 1 with a seating 
capacity of 250 with about 400 connections (10 model 560 APs) and lecture hall 
2 with a seating capacity of 197 (6 model 560 APs) and a general hall with 
seating capacity for 200 (4 model 466APs). We have a 10 GB backbone an all 
switches and a 500MB internet connection. We are running PRTG to monitor the 
bandwidth consumption at the backbone and internet level and do not see any 
bottlenecks.


We have conducted a Wi-Fi survey and have their report which mentioned 
co-channel interference in the 2.4Ghz band. According to the survey the Wi-Fi 
signal coverage seems to be present in most of the campus areas.

In order to minimize the co-channel interference, we have implemented the 
following:

1- Removed 40 Mhz and 80 MHz bandwidth modes and set everything to 20 Mhz.
2- Removed G on all our access points.
3- Implemented band steering.
4- We are now in the process of manually adjusting the 2.4 Ghz channels on each 
AP so the neighboring APs do not have the same channel. In some cases, we turn 
off the 2.4 Ghz completely.


Would you please comment on the following?

1- With the current hardware that we have is it advisable to proceed on this 
route and configure the 2.4 Ghz manually?
2- Should we completely disable 2.4 Ghz support? Is it a norm for high density 
areas?
3- Should we look to change hardware/ or vendor in order to have a seamless 
environment. Should we just limit the change to the high density areas or 
should we just change it overall.
4- Is a single channel solution for the lecture halls advisable? Have you 
experience a mix of single/multi-channel environment? How do they perform?

Zoltan
__________________________________________
Zoltan Toth - Manager, IT Infrastructure
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College






On 2016-11-18, 11:11 AM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group 
Listserv on behalf of Lee H Badman" <[email protected] on 
behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Zoltan,
>
>I'm assuming you're asking about wireless infrastructure and not client 
>devices? If so, I would say it's more about proper design than any different 
>technology.
>
>Also assuming that the lecture halls are in the mix with adjacent areas that 
>also part of the overall WLAN environment, you're generally limited to what 
>your current vendor (and code) support as opposed to trying to run islands of 
>different technology from Vendor B in the middle of Vendor A WLAN.
>
>Which brings us back to design. In a perfect world, you'd have some sense of 
>what type of client devices are likely to be in those rooms, how many active 
>at a time, and what they might be doing. For modern APs, you might service 
>200-300 "people" with 2-3 APs with captive antennas spaced and oriented 
>properly (depending on room layout), or you may need double that with 
>extremely low power and directional antennas.
>
>So... the answer is "it depends", as with all things wireless.
>
>Regards-
>
>Lee
>
>Lee Badman | CWNE #200 | Network Architect
>
>Information Technology Services
>206 Machinery Hall
>120 Smith Drive
>Syracuse, New York 13244
>t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e [email protected] w its.syr.edu
>SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
>syr.edu
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zoltan Toth
>Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:47 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] High-Density Lecture Halls
>
>What technologies do you use for high density areas like Lecture Halls for 
>about 200-300 people?
>
>__________________________________________
>Zoltan Toth - Manager, IT Infrastructure
>Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
>
>
>This communication together with any attachments is for the exclusive and 
>confidential use of the addressee(s). Any other distribution, use or 
>reproduction without the sender’s prior consent is unauthorized and strictly 
>prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
>sender immediately and delete or shred the message without making any copies.
>
>**********
>Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
>discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
>
>**********
>Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
>discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
This communication together with any attachments is for the exclusive and 
confidential use of the addressee(s). Any other distribution, use or 
reproduction without the sender’s prior consent is unauthorized and strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete or shred the message without making any copies.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Attachment: default.vnd[nynz].ms-officetheme
Description: default.vnd[nynz].ms-officetheme

Reply via email to