Hi Bryan, This doesn’t answer your question, but I thought I’d mention that we ended up going with the 2800 series APs instead of the 3800s. Historically we’ve stayed in the 3000 series but for the differences between the 2800 and 3800, we thought the 2800 was enough for our environment.
Hit me direct if you’d like more info. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> on behalf of Bryan Ward <[email protected]> Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 3800 Series APs Couldn’t find a recent discussion on the list archives, so I’ll ask my question. For those of you that have Cisco 3800 series APs in production, how have they been working for you recently? We currently purchase 3700 series APs as our standard for new installs and replacement of our 3500 series APs, but are now considering switching to the 3800 series. I heard there were a lot of issues with them at first, but was wondering if they’re still troublesome now that they’ve been out in the wild for some time. Also, does anyone currently have issues using Prime to manage them? Thanks all, -- Bryan Ward Network Engineer Dartmouth College Network Services 603-646-2245 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
