Tim,

These calculations incorrect,
if to consider as their by exact,
then the communication using reflection is impossible,
for example from buildings or from the Moon :)

Path loss for 2.4GHz -> -115 -20log(d_km)  ;)

-Ivan


 
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:00:30PM -0600, Mike Avery wrote:
> > On 29 May 2002 at 11:02, Tim Pozar wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:44:59AM -0700, Tim Pozar wrote:
> > > > As an example...
> >
> > > > If we had a 24 dBi antenna on both ends of a point-to-point link
> > > > with the legal max power of .25 Watts (FCC 15.247) we would have a
> > > > fade margin of 47.775 dB (with a 80 dBm RX threshold) over a 1 mile
> > > > link.  If we had a passive repeater connecting two 1 mile links we
> > > > would have to multiply the pass loss of one link (104.2 dB) by 2 and
> > > > the antenna gain (48 dBi) by 2.  This would have a total path loss
> > > > of 108.4 dB and would put the RX signal at -88.42 dBm.
> >
> > > Whoops... That should be 208.4 dB.
> >
> > I believe you were closer the first time at 108.4 dB.  dB
> > are not a linear scale, and a doubling or halving of signal is
> > a 3 db change.  So, if you lose 104.2db on each leg, the
> > total loss would be 107.2 db because you have doubled the
> > loss - or added another 3 db of loss.
> 
> Hmmm...  I may not have described how this works very well.  Sorry
> gang...
> 
> Say if I have a link that goes through a passive repeater, each
> link has path loss.  Path loss it pretty easy to calculate (check
> out http://www.lns.com/papers/pathcalc) and for a 1 mile 2.4 GHz
> path it is just slightly more than 104.2 dB.   Since you have two
> links, you just add these number together with other loss factors
> such as coax or connector loss.  On the "gain" side of things you
> have the transmitter power and antenna gain.  You would add these
> number together.
> 
> An sample calculation (from pathcalc.pl - see above)...
> 
>         Frequency       = 2.4 GHz
>         TPO             = .25 Watts
>         TPO             = 23.9794000867204 dBm
>         TX line loss    = 3 dB
>         TX ant gain     = 24 dBi
>         Path length     = 1 miles
>         Path loss       = 104.204224834232 dB
>         RX ant gain     = 24 dBi
>         RX line loss    = 3 dB
>         RX signal       = -38.2248247475117 dBm
>         RX threshold    = -80
>         Fade margin     = 41.7751752524883 dB
> 
> Since we have two links, we need to double the line loss, antenna
> gain and path loss numbers as we have two links and 4 antennas.  So...
> 
> TPO =                      24 dBm
> TX line loss =          -   3 dB
> TX ant gain =           +  24 dBi
> Path loss =             - 104.204224834232 dB
> Repeater RX line loss = -   3 dB
> Repeater RX ant gain =  +  24 dBi
> Repeater TX ant gain =  +  24 dBi
> Repeater TX line loss = -   3 dB
> Path loss =             - 104.204224834232 dB
> RX ant gain =           +  24 dBi
> TX line loss =          -   3 dB
>                         ========
>                         - 100.4 dBm
> 
> Since most radios want about - 80 dBm for a signal, this path won't
> work as it is 20 dB below the RX threshold.  (This time I calculated
> transmission and connector line loss.)
> 
> Tim
> --
> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to