At 01:28 PM 6/1/2002 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >I'm using 6 WAP11 in APC mode connected to WAP11 in AP mode. There is a lot of >problems and i want to change main AP with something better - i thought about >Cisco Aironet 350 wireless bridge. Did someone test this? I wonder if the >result will be like now - one wireless lan. Also, i read in cisco.com that >only 8 clients can connect to one Cisco wireless bridge at the same time?
The Cisco "wireless bridge" ($1300) or the "workgroup bridge" ($500)? Two very different beasts, at least in firmware and function. Wireless bridges talk to each other over long distances and they're not WiFi. The WGB talks to Cisco APs, acting much like WAP11 APC, passing up to eight MACs. WAP11 in APC will connect to Cisco APs but you need to spoof MACs in order to get them to pass anything. See http://lists.bawug.org/pipermail/wireless/2002-April/006379.html and other articles in May for more details. - John -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
