�� 01 06 2002 15:04, John Foust ���������: > At 01:28 PM 6/1/2002 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >I'm using 6 WAP11 in APC mode connected to WAP11 in AP mode. There is a > > lot of problems and i want to change main AP with something better - i > > thought about Cisco Aironet 350 wireless bridge. Did someone test this? I > > wonder if the result will be like now - one wireless lan. Also, i read in > > cisco.com that only 8 clients can connect to one Cisco wireless bridge at > > the same time? > > The Cisco "wireless bridge" ($1300) or the "workgroup bridge" ($500)? > Two very different beasts, at least in firmware and function. > Wireless bridges talk to each other over long distances and > they're not WiFi. > > The WGB talks to Cisco APs, acting much like WAP11 APC, passing > up to eight MACs. WAP11 in APC will connect to Cisco APs but you need > to spoof MACs in order to get them to pass anything. See > http://lists.bawug.org/pipermail/wireless/2002-April/006379.html > and other articles in May for more details. > > - John
Thanks John! the "beast" that will work for me is WGB, but with this 8 MAC's it's unuseble. I have about 30 PC on the ethernet port of each WAP. Is there a better decision, with equipment of other manufactures? And, I want to change only the AP, not clients. Thanks again -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
