Maybe, but most OTHER ML's do it server-side and add the tag "Reply-to:" to each message.
Anyways, I like my mozilla....hey....at least it ain't microsoft. G. D Phelps wrote: > >> > OT-sidenote: I wish the BAWUG ML server would add the reply-to tag on >> > its own.... >> >> Get better email software. http://russnelson.com/rt.html >> >> -- >> -russ nelson http://russnelson.com > > > Rather than a "Reply to Recepient" option, > we need a RFC and implementation of "Reply-to-Mail List"! > An RFC for both mailing list, and email clients to implement. > "Reply to Recepient" may be understandable to this list, > but certainly not to the mass hords of (AOL) users. > > dp > > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
