On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:31:51PM -0800, Patrick Leary wrote:
> 
> All the hotspot noise as far as the major IT interests are concerned is only
> about getting the money out of business travelers in hotels, airports, and
> coffee shops.

<snip>

First off, I'm very much in support of FCC legal (atleast EIRP limits)
and net edicate (no NAT, no UCE,  etc) WISPs.  My background is from a
small ISP.  We were nothing more then a few PortMasters, BSDI boxes and
a huge RBOC mux.  Sure, we hovered around 500 customers; sure, we didn't
have a dedicated webmaster to use the latest JavaScript eyecandy, sure,
we didn't have an Internet Explorer binary that says "Powered by xyz
ISP"; BUT, we did provide amazing customer support.  We did visit homes
and small businesses to get connectivity working correctly, free of
charge.  We taught monthly classes on mIRC, Microsoft's new Frontpage
vs. HomeSite, the works.  We provided discounts for the local computer
user groups.  We wouldn't markup InterNIC domain registrations.  Yes,
small ISPs (Wired and/or Wireless) provide a value-add.  Unfortunately,
successful ones tend to get bigger, with customer support draining.  Bay
Area favorites include zoom, best, aimnet, tlgnet, etc.

However, your attack on hotspot's is little frustrating.  T-Mobile isn't
the only "hotspoter" and Boingo isn't the only "aggregator".  I won't
get into the argument over the model of aggregators, but do flip over
your ATM card, notice the Plus/Star/etc. logos... This model has been
proven to work and will not go away.    I'm not in support of it,
though; but I still like my friends who run Linux too.

As for the hotspot companies themselves, I think you need to do a lot
more research.  Not all of "them" are marketing to the rich tie suit
exec at the airport or suite hotel.  Infact, I know of a few who are
actually making money; I contract for one.  As with any buildout, it's
important to "cookie cutter" solutions.  Dropping a T1 and a rack of
Cisco equipment isn't a cost effective cookie.  Especially for an
emerging industry.

As for WISPs and Hotspot'ers working together, it's been a dynamite
experience for us.  They tend to have a clue about their network (since
they build the entire infrastructure) and it's simply a question of
channel coordination and IP settings.  We plug a box on their network
and suddently it becomes a fly trap.

-- 
Matt Peterson                  Bay Area Wireless Users Group
Founder                              <http://www.bawug.org/>
                                                          --
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to