RE: [BAWUG] New 11g products

[Jim Thompson]

(BThis is the trouble with "Pre-standard" products.
(B
(B(That said, my Prism2.5-based card talks just fine to a broadcom-based
(BAP.)
(B
(BAllen Tsai writes:
(B> For example, if you have a Cisco 350 PC Card, it won't connect to Linksys 11g AP.  
(B>If you have a Dlink 614+ AP, your Linksys 11g PC Card can't associate to it.  At 
(B>least the Linksys 11g AP and PC Card worked with each other!  I think this may 
(B>explain why Broadcom is trying to start its own interoperability standard, which I'm 
(B>sure will bode well with Wi-Fi...
(B> 
(B> Al
(B> 
(B> 
(B> 
(B> -----Original Message-----
(B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allen Fear
(B> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:01 AM
(B> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Subject: Re: [BAWUG] New 11g products
(B> 
(B> 
(B> 
(B> Very interesting. Could you be a little more specific?
(B> Which cards/chipsets is the new .g stuff struggling
(B> with? -Allen
(B> 
(B> --- Allen Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(B> > Anybody play with the new 11g products from Linksys?
(B> >  I picked up an AP and PC Card from Fry's, and it
(B> > seems it is not as "backward compatible" as it
(B> > claims.  I wonder if Broadcom, Intersil, or TI chips
(B> > will talk to each other...I sure hope this backward
(B> > compatibility faux pas doens't ruin the 11g market.
(B> > 
(B> >
(B> Al
i^-)p
(B> 7%zK%
(B> KZm,.Xbm6Ck
(B>  "8?:{.nG+    7!6Z~X,6FZBh(.fj)fje
(B> Kbz?B*^k,
(B> 
(B> 
(B> __________________________________________________
(B> Do you Yahoo!?
(B> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
(B> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
(B> --
(B> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
(B> [un]subscribe: 
(B>http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless��ޭ�p���z�%��Zm�.��b�m����
(B>k���?�{.n�+������X������(��j)fj��b��?�*ޕ�,
(B-- 
(B
(B--
(Bgeneral wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
(B[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless