On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 10:56, Dan Fitzpatrick wrote: > These are one way, satellite antennas (i.e. down converter, no > transverter). This will not work on so many levels. > > Dan.
ah yes this is true. i was thinking i would have to put a different deal in place of the lnb. i saw some diagrams of biquad which didn't look too hard to make. as for suitability, what i don't understand very well is receiving signal. i've seen the transmit diagrams for dipoles and biquads and that sort of makes sense, but i'm not sure how receiving works. IE: if san bruno has a little dipole on it, how much area do i need to receive at distance X? jason -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
