Andrew,

Thank :)

WAP11(v1.1 "ATMEL+PRISM II" ) today it SmartBridges,
and SmartBridges use "WAP11(v1.1) power hack" 
without  any problems :)

-Ivan


> 
> Not to spoil the fun, but the WAP11 "dirty" hack wasn't all that dirty
> according to independent verification.
> 
> http://explorer.cyberstreet.com/wap11/WAP11_Spectral_Output.html
> 
> Andrew Stern
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Casey Halverson wrote:
> 
>  > I'm not a big fan of power anymore.  High antenna gain is much more
>  > productive, and its safer that way too...
>  >
>  > I think there is a big problem with modifications, especially done by
>  > hackers that have no test equipment.  And yes, even a few milliwatts
>  > adjustment brings it out of type acceptance.  Those power amps have have
>  > specified min/max values, but that doesn't mean it will work a damn at
>  > any given value.
>  > Lets take the WAP11 hack for example.  Not only did it splatter the
>  > entire 2.4GHz band, it put out spurs up and and down the spectrum.  EIRP
>  > limits mean nothing when your power isnt even on frequency. All one
>  > needs is a nice little spike on the input of an emergency services
>  > repeater to make you really popular with the FCC .. Or worse yet, the
>  > hams   *duck*
>  >
>  > Given linksys' colorful history of out of specification operation, I
>  > think it would be interesting to test out the WRT54's emissions after
>  > the hack.
>  >
>  >> -----Original Message-----
>  >> From: Brian Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January
> 14, 2004 12:00 PM
>  >> To: Greg DesBrisay; Wirless Forum
>  >> Subject: Re: stupid tx power tricks (was Fw: [BAWUG] bridging help)
>  >>
>  >> I understand and you are correct. But I tend to be less concerned
> about rules than about safety and good engineering. And from a practical
> point of view, if the signal quality is acceptable and the EIRP is
> within limits, I doubt the FCC will come knocking on your door.
>  >>
>  >> (Disclaimer: you violate FCC rules at your own risk.  Don't blame me.)
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
>  > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  >
>  >
> --
> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to