Casey Halverson wrote:
 
> What scares me even more is that the runs of WAP11 hardware and revs
> were so inconsistent.  Some revs take the hack very well, others do not.
> This is simply due to the fact that they were spec'ed and tested to
> operate at a much lower power level.  There could have been two
> completely different power amps in the finals.

Yes,
100mW,
200mW,
and 100mW + 300mW ...

Three completely different power amps ;)

-Ivan

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 7:05 PM
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: stupid tx power tricks (was Fw: [BAWUG] bridging help)
> >
> >
> > Not to spoil the fun, but the WAP11 "dirty" hack wasn't all
> > that dirty
> > according to independent verification.
> >
> > http://explorer.cyberstreet.com/wap11/WAP11_Spectral_Output.html
> >
> > Andrew Stern
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to