Eliminate NAT for breaking the end-to-end principle? :)
(Dan)
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:06:31AM -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 03:09:35PM -0800, cubes wrote:
> > over. Also, there are *far* more pressing problems facing the net at
> > large than this one, for example, come up with a solution for DOS
> > attacks and you'll make lots of people happy.
>
> Disconnect all the links to backbones that don't enforce ingress source
> address filtering?
>
> <GDRVVF>
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100
> The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
> Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
>
> Come see Linux Gazette in our new home: www.linuxgazette.net!
> --
> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
