Their model is subject to error as well (they haven't proven it, or at least, haven't detailed any proof in the paper.)
Color me skeptical...
On Apr 15, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Rodney Milam wrote:
Yeah, I had the same question. The only reason that I could come up
with was that the measurements were taken by a different group at a
different location than the people who did the computer simulation or so
it sounded as such. But it is Lucent, or Bell Labs, who I would put my
money on when it comes to wireless. But then again you never know. It
does make sense though, to me at least. I thought it was at least worth
mentioning.
Thanks, Rodney Milam Infinite Technologies Group, Inc. www.ItsInfinite.com
Original Message by Jim Thompson: --------------------------------------- Its a prediction.
I'm left to wonder why they didn't measure it, since they measured the H-V case... --------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list [unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
