Of course it is. Exactly why WISPs need fair terms and equipment for 3650 .
Tom DeReggi
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected toofficially
proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
Charles Wu wrote:
<snip>
If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I would
NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from customer
to
carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it...
</snip>
So here's the caveat...
If you refuse to be regulated, then you shouldn't complain when the FCC
rewrites the rules and stops regulating phone/cable incumbents
You can't have "double standards" - and they can always put up a
super-mesh
network and trash your spectrum (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/
WiFi
access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to
the
consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an "insidious method" of
trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks)
Especially when those wireless routers put out 400 mW.....
John
-Charles
-------------------------------------------
WISPNOG Park City, UT
http://www.wispnog.com
August 15-17, 2005
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.1/64 - Release Date: 8/4/2005
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
