Guys,
try this URL:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts

i found 351 entries, however, there were only 127 since 
9/12/05.  Only 49 entries in Oct. 2005.  Mine was there, I 
did not see Georges, in fact there was short note begging 
George not send more.

Ron Wallace

---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
>From: George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 
go!  
>To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
>
>Ok something wacky is going on.
>Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
>http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_list&id_proceeding=04-186
>
>George
>
>Tony Weasler wrote:
>> Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 
first filing
>> I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 
from
>> "COMMENT" to "STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD."
>> 
>> The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 
you send to
>> the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 
with the
>> correct information.
>> 
>> Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 
they filed
>> should check to see if your filing is still there:
>> http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_list&id_proceeding=04-
186&start=1&end=2000&first_time=N
>> 
>>  - Tony
>> 
>> P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 
1/1/05 are
>> marked as "Document Type: NOTICE" and not "STATEMENT" 
or "STATEMENT
>> FOR THE RECORD"  Is it possible that statements are being 
erased as
>> well?  I filed one copy as a "STATEMENT" and another as 
a "STATEMENT
>> FOR THE RECORD" and both have identical information in the 
search
>> results.  Should we be filing "notices" instead?
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:
>> 
>>>Funny thing is I filled this one out.
>>>I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 
day after we
>>>sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 
responses and
>>>my response can not be found.
>>>Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 
response missing?
>>>
>>>George
>>>
>>>
>>>John Scrivner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 
clear message
>>>>to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 
unused
>>>>television channel space. Your messages are going to be 
heard.  04-186
>>>>is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition
>>>>from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 
do not want
>>>>anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the
>>>>FCC that you need those unused television channels to 
help grow your
>>>>business and serve those hard to reach customers then 
please do so
>>>>now. Here are the instructions once again:
>>>>
>>>>GO RIGHT NOW TO:
>>>>http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
>>>>
>>>>A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 
the blanks
>>>>with your contact information. Use the guide below for 
specific lines
>>>>to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 
correctly.
>>>>
>>>>1) Where it says "Proceeding" type in 04-186
>>>>2) For the "Mail Correspondence to" line click on "Name".
>>>>4) and 5) Leave Blank
>>>>11) Check "Late Filed" check box.
>>>>12) Select the drop down for "Statement for the Record"
>>>>
>>>>The other lines not listed above are things like your 
name which I
>>>>will assume you guys have covered. :-)
>>>>
>>>>Then type your comments about why you need those TV 
channels for
>>>>broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 
FCC. Just tell
>>>>them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 
correct
>>>>spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 
only one
>>>>sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 
industry on this
>>>>NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 
comments in
>>>>support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 
ruling.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks guys,
>>>>Scriv
>>>>
>>>>PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 
pass this on if
>>>>you are.
>>>
>>>
>
>-- 
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to