11MByte/sec as in approx 88Mbps?  Sounds about like NStreme Turbo (40MHz
channel) or Alvarion B100 (40MHz channel).

Considering this thread was originally about the RB532 and its shortcomings,
has anyone tried loading MikroTik OS onto the StarOS 533MHz hardware?

Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routerboard 532 and NStreme2

Lonnie,

Wow, that was fast.  Great New!
Testing starts this week.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lonnie Nunweiler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routerboard 532 and NStreme2


> Tom,
>
> The new V3 release has been posted and you can set MTU to very high
> values if your cards support jumbo frames.  Our WAR board, with its
> very advanced Intel Ethernet can do 16K for the MTU.  Most other cards
> have limits in the 2K to 4K range.
>
> We also have released the first x86 PC Architecture version and the
> updated x86 WRAP version.  They  have the same features as the WAR
> version.
>
> I'm not sure if we mentioned it but the x86 version has a free mode
> that is no longer a 24 hour trial.  It saves settings and everything
> works, except of course the advanced features that we use to add
> value.  You can use it for fairly advance routing (quagga has ospf and
> rip) for free.
>
> We'll require a paid license for wireless, policy or source routing,
> bandwidth control and our firewall scripting.  We are pretty sure that
> more than 11 MBytes/sec in Turbo mode on a power machine will meet
> with approval.  Device bonding will be coming fairly soon and it will
> allow simple hdx bonding, fdx bonding and failover bonding.
>
> We use the Linux 2.6 kernel and we have been able to get this image to
> well under 8 MB and average ram use on bootup is about 16 MB.  It took
> a long time to get here and we have to thank everybody for being
> patient.  Some of you wrote us off and figured that V3 would never
> reach the light of day, so I hope you take a look at what this new
> release can do.
>
> Lonnie
>
>
>
> On 8/15/06, Tom DeReggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lonnie,
>>
>> When you get that feature solved / added, please let me know, or make a
>> public announcement.
>> If you let me know, I'll do a bunch of talk for you persoanlly, to 
>> promote
>> the feature.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Tom DeReggi
>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Lonnie Nunweiler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
>> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 8:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routerboard 532 and NStreme2
>>
>>
>> > It will just be easier to support an insane MTU size so that people
>> > can go and do whatever they want.  I can imagine people doing some
>> > vlan in vlan and then running the whole works over a tunnel, and each
>> > one adds tags and headers to the actual 1500 byte payload.
>> >
>> > Lonnie
>> >
>> > On 8/14/06, Tom DeReggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Lonnie,
>> >>
>> >> I just wrote to you off list, before seeing your onlist response.
>> >>
>> >> >V3 has support for a fully transparent
>> >> > client bridge when it talks to an appropriately configured V3 AP
>> >> > system.
>> >>
>> >> That is good news!
>> >>
>> >> > License Fee after 1 year.
>> >>
>> >> The policy you explained, is fair and reasonable.
>> >>
>> >> > We are currently working on a custom MTU size interface for every
>> >> > device to be able to handle whatever you want for MTU size.
>> >>
>> >> Great.  To be more clear... Its easy for people (like me) to get 
>> >> confused
>> >> between IP versus Ethernet headers. In our VLAN applications, its the
>> >> Ethernet packet that needs to be supported above 1500bytes (for 
>> >> addition
>> >> of
>> >> VLAN to Ethernet header), we'd rarely ever need to increase IP packet 
>> >> MTU
>> >> above 1500 MTU. (although I see applications for IPSEC if larger MTU
>> >> allowed
>> >> or possibly for passing MPLS).
>> >>
>> >> Tom DeReggi
>> >> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>> >> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>> >>
>> > --
>> > Lonnie Nunweiler
>> > Valemount Networks Corporation
>> > http://www.star-os.com/
>> > --
>> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> >
>> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>> --
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Lonnie Nunweiler
> Valemount Networks Corporation
> http://www.star-os.com/
> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to