Differrance between a SR2 and CM9. the CM9 is better at receiving, more sensitive I belive, not to mention, its not yelling all the time. CM9s are a staple, when you don't have trees. Try dropping the power output on your SR2, maybe you can find a happy medium. Have you tried replacing the SR2, we had just replaced two, we were getting -80s on a small backhaul, MT to MT, and after we swapped the radio, we were back at -60 .. Why, got me!
Dennis Burgess, MCP, CCNA, A+, N+, Mikrotik Certified [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.2kwireless.com 2K Wireless provides high-speed internet access, along with network consulting for WISPs, and business's with a focus on TCP/IP networking, security, and Mikrotik routers. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:05 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] star os/sr2----mikrotik/cm9 When I use sr2 my ack timing is all over the place, like 300 and the links are crap. I drop in a cm9 and all the ack's fall to 30's where they should be. This is all on MT. Brian Blair Davis wrote: > The cm9 is rated for 17db > > The sr2 is rated for about 26db.... > > we are happy with the sr2, sr5 and sr9. all deployed and work well.... > > Brian Rohrbacher wrote: > >> I replaced a star os/sr2 with a mikrotik/cm9 setup on an omni. I >> thought it would help my noise issues to get rid of the amped up >> sr2. It may have helped a little but now I have signal that I think >> it quite a bit less at the clients. What level of power is the cm9 >> at by default in a mikrotik and if I switch it to manual what could I >> push it to? >> >> Brian > > > -- WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/