On 12/3/06, Tom DeReggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Somethings don't need proof, to be known to be true. I also don't feel there are many real world evaluations that give credability to what a valuation can end up being based on equipment. There are to many factors in a sale, to know exactly why the price was or wasn't gotten. My proof is just my own common sense, learned from communication with prospective buyers. I've NEVER heard a response "Oh you have Alvarion, not sure I want to give you credit for that crap." It just doesn't happen. I don't even think the buyers understand the difference in the various gear. But it can never hurt you to a product that someone almost definately has heard of, and recognize as a name brand product.
I personally would pay more for an Alvarion or Motorola network vs 802.11. I just wondered if there was anything behind the statement that an Alvarion network would bring more than Moto. Two name-brand networks - where Motorola certainly has greater recognition. But there is no substance behind the claim, so I can drop it now. Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/