Wow Tom. That comment is really out of character and your emotions must have gotten the best of you. Doing what you suggest with your "Equalizer" is going to get you in a boat load of trouble one day.
Best, Brad -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] high throughput backhaul options Tom DeReggi wrote: > If our link is up, and we see new interference on it, we go after the > interferer until they move. I can tell you, if someone puts up a radio > using all 100mhz of spectrum, and it happens to cross one of our > cellsite or subscribers taking them down, the offendor's link will be > taken down (made unusable) within 24 hours, that I promise and > guarantee. Why do I say that, because I'm follow your advise Bob, > business is business. What comes around goes around. I got a radio on > the shelf that I call the Equalizer ready and waiting, and 200 class > A/B roof tops to create a ligitimate PtP link to take it down. NOBODY > is above/invulnerable to interference. And a tech is fooling > theirself is their strategy is they are always going to deploy smarter > than the next guy. We all have the same gear available to us. > The above both in your suggested course of action and the fact that you state it on a public mailing list easily searchable by Google almost ensures a law suit should you ever take your suggested course of action. There are numerous better ways to deal with interference and/or competitors. -Matt -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
