StarOS has the ability to run a VDS tunnel from any two StarOS V3 devices. That will enable you to run a 128 or 256 bit AES encrypted tunnel. If memory serves me correctly, Lonnie is able to get 15mbps or more out of that type of setup?
If you're worried about interference, try x2 or x4 cloaking on the 5GHz bands. I'm getting ready to install a dedicated T1 replacement, the customer was worried about security. The ability to encrypt with AES won them over. I should have said 3 WAR boards, not RADIOS, sorry about the confusion. The amount of radios you use is up to you, but you would want atleast 4 radio cards for what you're trying to do. On 12/12/06, Carlos A. Garcia G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, following your recomendations in order to set up the link without using more than 3 radios what you recommend its to use th WAR from Staros i have a wireless repeaters using cisco so the extra radios for customers are not necesary (sorry my english) if i use this NOC war with one antenna and radio at 5.8GHz to connect with the middle POP war dual 2 radios 2 antennas at 5.8GHz and finally the customer POP war and what about security the guy ask me to doit secure meaning not easy for the folks. (he knows total security its an utopia a Guajiro dream!!) Lonnie Nunweiler escribió: > My recommendation is to have a dual WAR board at the main POP. Use a > 5 GHz antenna and radio to connect tot the middle repeater and have a > 2.4 GHz with an omni at the main just to be able to connect any local > customers. The biggest investment is the CPU board and time to > install, and an extra radio and 15 dB omni is cheap. Even a couple of > subscribers will make it pay. > > At the middle repeater I would use a dual WAR with 5 GHz radios to > point to main and the remote end. If you want some local service at > that repeater then use a 4 port WAR and throw a 2.4 GHz and 900 MHz > card in it or both 2.4 GHz or 900 MHz. Your choice. > > The remote end is a copy of the main end with a dual WAR and 5 GHz > input and a 2.4 GHz to an omni for local use. > > This arrangement will get you 20 to 30 mbps of sustained throughput as > long as the middle repeater is no farther than 30 miles from either > end. You'll also have a couple of revenue generating AP units at each > end and potentially the middle. > > Lonnie > > On 12/12/06, Carlos A. Garcia G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have just recived an answer from chad saying that starOS its a good >> choice, thanks chad ill check it, for your question yes i w'd like to >> play, i have never deployed my routers, but i really would like to, so >> im like a newbie compared to the people in this list but im hungry to >> learn the how to, thanks to everybody, this is an amazing list. >> >> Mario Pommier escribió: >> > Carlos, >> > that's your first item, your line of thinking seems accurate: >> > >> > Cisco, Proxim, Trango, Alvarion, StarOS, Mikrotik -- what equipment >> > will you choose and what is the advantage/disadvantage of each. >> > Maybe your first perspective is: do you want to go with a >> > "finished, packaged" product, or do you want to be able to "play more >> > with the tools and toys" out there? >> > The type of computer person you are may be a good guide: do you >> > deploy your own Unix/Linux based routers or do you buy Cisco finished >> > products? >> > Hope that helps some. >> > >> > Mario >> > >> > Carlos A. Garcia G wrote: >> > >> >> Thank u very much, but the question it is, i do not know many >> >> equipments, i have only work with cisco aironet, the last time i do >> >> something similar and get the cisco 1300 series the problem it is >> >> that in order that this work i have to use 4 radios >> >> >> >> 1300<-->[1300 -ethernet-1300]<-->1300 >> >> >> >> and what i need it is to know for example: the proxim LMG22 work in >> >> 5.8 and can be used as: >> >> >> >> LMG22<-->LMG22<-->LMG22 >> >> >> >> im currently looking with cisco, proxym, trango, mikrotik but i dont >> >> get the answer that im looking for. >> >> Mike Brownson escribió: >> >> >> >>> Carlos, >> >>> >> >>> It all depends on how big a hill and what speed you need. There is >> >>> some PtP equipment (Motorola PtP, formerly Orthogon) that can talk >> >>> over the hill in one link if the hill is not too big or the distance >> >>> is not too long. Other option is to put another repeater in >> >>> between. But that means another radio site. If you want to send me >> >>> latitude and longitude of both sites I can see if the one radio link >> >>> will work. >> >>> >> >>> Mike B >> >>> >> >>> Carlos A. Garcia G wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi i have a problem i need to establish a wireless link betwen my >> >>>> ofice and another ofice there are a hill betwen so what equipment >> >>>> or vendors do i have to contact: look! >> >>>> >> >>>> NOC <-->> POP <-->> OFFICE >> >>>> ???? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- Chad Halsted The Computer Works Conway, AR www.tcworks.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
