Carlos, the Cisco 1242's bridge, but need to be put in a NEMA box to be outdoor rated. You can get them for about $500 on the street. Now, before everyone jumps on, YES, they are more expensive than Mikrotik and some others, but they do bridge well.
JT >-----Original Message----- >From: Carlos A. Garcia G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 08:21 AM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: Re: [WISPA] Need opinion > >Thank u very much at the list the opinions that you gaved me has help me >a lot, as far as i could see it is that its better to work with 4 radio >bridges, not the las time i did that i use cisco 2.4 1310 bridge i have >to say that works very stable, but the solution for 5.8 its the 1400 as >far as i remember only one bridge has the cost of 4000 us, that much >more expensive that i tought so i have checked another products recently >i checked proxim QuickBridge.11 5054-R, who has used the proxim >equipments, any one with experience can tell me about it? > >Chad Halsted escribió: >> StarOS has the ability to run a VDS tunnel from any two StarOS V3 >> devices. That will enable you to run a 128 or 256 bit AES encrypted >> tunnel. If memory serves me correctly, Lonnie is able to get 15mbps >> or more out of that type of setup? >> >> If you're worried about interference, try x2 or x4 cloaking on the >> 5GHz bands. >> >> I'm getting ready to install a dedicated T1 replacement, the customer >> was worried about security. The ability to encrypt with AES won them >> over. >> >> I should have said 3 WAR boards, not RADIOS, sorry about the >> confusion. The amount of radios you use is up to you, but you would >> want atleast 4 radio cards for what you're trying to do. >> >> >> On 12/12/06, Carlos A. Garcia G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Ok, following your recomendations in order to set up the link without >>> using more than 3 radios what you recommend its to use th WAR from >>> Staros i have a wireless repeaters using cisco so the extra radios for >>> customers are not necesary (sorry my english) if i use this >>> >>> NOC war with one antenna and radio at 5.8GHz to connect with the middle >>> POP war dual 2 radios 2 antennas at 5.8GHz and finally the customer >>> POP war >>> and what about security the guy ask me to doit secure meaning not easy >>> for the folks. (he knows total security its an utopia a Guajiro dream!!) >>> >>> Lonnie Nunweiler escribió: >>> > My recommendation is to have a dual WAR board at the main POP. Use a >>> > 5 GHz antenna and radio to connect tot the middle repeater and have a >>> > 2.4 GHz with an omni at the main just to be able to connect any local >>> > customers. The biggest investment is the CPU board and time to >>> > install, and an extra radio and 15 dB omni is cheap. Even a couple of >>> > subscribers will make it pay. >>> > >>> > At the middle repeater I would use a dual WAR with 5 GHz radios to >>> > point to main and the remote end. If you want some local service at >>> > that repeater then use a 4 port WAR and throw a 2.4 GHz and 900 MHz >>> > card in it or both 2.4 GHz or 900 MHz. Your choice. >>> > >>> > The remote end is a copy of the main end with a dual WAR and 5 GHz >>> > input and a 2.4 GHz to an omni for local use. >>> > >>> > This arrangement will get you 20 to 30 mbps of sustained throughput as >>> > long as the middle repeater is no farther than 30 miles from either >>> > end. You'll also have a couple of revenue generating AP units at each >>> > end and potentially the middle. >>> > >>> > Lonnie >>> > >>> > On 12/12/06, Carlos A. Garcia G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> I have just recived an answer from chad saying that starOS its a good >>> >> choice, thanks chad ill check it, for your question yes i w'd like to >>> >> play, i have never deployed my routers, but i really would like >>> to, so >>> >> im like a newbie compared to the people in this list but im hungry to >>> >> learn the how to, thanks to everybody, this is an amazing list. >>> >> >>> >> Mario Pommier escribió: >>> >> > Carlos, >>> >> > that's your first item, your line of thinking seems accurate: >>> >> > >>> >> > Cisco, Proxim, Trango, Alvarion, StarOS, Mikrotik -- what >>> equipment >>> >> > will you choose and what is the advantage/disadvantage of each. >>> >> > Maybe your first perspective is: do you want to go with a >>> >> > "finished, packaged" product, or do you want to be able to "play >>> more >>> >> > with the tools and toys" out there? >>> >> > The type of computer person you are may be a good guide: do you >>> >> > deploy your own Unix/Linux based routers or do you buy Cisco >>> finished >>> >> > products? >>> >> > Hope that helps some. >>> >> > >>> >> > Mario >>> >> > >>> >> > Carlos A. Garcia G wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Thank u very much, but the question it is, i do not know many >>> >> >> equipments, i have only work with cisco aironet, the last time >>> i do >>> >> >> something similar and get the cisco 1300 series the problem it is >>> >> >> that in order that this work i have to use 4 radios >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 1300<-->[1300 -ethernet-1300]<-->1300 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> and what i need it is to know for example: the proxim LMG22 >>> work in >>> >> >> 5.8 and can be used as: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> LMG22<-->LMG22<-->LMG22 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> im currently looking with cisco, proxym, trango, mikrotik but i >>> dont >>> >> >> get the answer that im looking for. >>> >> >> Mike Brownson escribió: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Carlos, >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> It all depends on how big a hill and what speed you need. >>> There is >>> >> >>> some PtP equipment (Motorola PtP, formerly Orthogon) that can >>> talk >>> >> >>> over the hill in one link if the hill is not too big or the >>> distance >>> >> >>> is not too long. Other option is to put another repeater in >>> >> >>> between. But that means another radio site. If you want to >>> send me >>> >> >>> latitude and longitude of both sites I can see if the one >>> radio link >>> >> >>> will work. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Mike B >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Carlos A. Garcia G wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Hi i have a problem i need to establish a wireless link >>> betwen my >>> >> >>>> ofice and another ofice there are a hill betwen so what >>> equipment >>> >> >>>> or vendors do i have to contact: look! >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> NOC <-->> POP <-->> OFFICE >>> >> >>>> ???? >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >>> >> >>> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >> >>> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >>> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>> >> >> > >-- >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
