I have not and will not be concerned about the phone company. We all should
be streaming our businesses to have multiple revenue streams to adjust to
the influx of customers coming and going from DSL and Cable. I don't know
what it is like in your areas, but just because they are here doesn't mean
any of the following.
1. their networks are capable even after upgrading.
2. they have any clue on costomer service and the needs of their valued
3. the customer is typically sick of the out of town influence
4. they cannot stay on a price point without stuffing all the inclusives
down the customers throat.
5. they can never have the quality control that we have when we manage our
networks becuase we care down to the placement of the ethernet in the home
for the customers
6. computers are always going to create the need for us to repair them.
AT&T can't manage a phone let alone a computer
7. When you get so big as they are money is everything. We alwasy maintain
customer relationships are everything.
8. ok... you get my point.
As for $99 per month for you 256K... i am underpriced.... that is what the
market will do for you.
It is an abosolute shame that the large companies have destroyed the margins
in this business. They found that they cann't manage the money from the
phone services and now when they all had a chance to make some real money
the screwed that up too. Give it time and stay the course. They cannot
continue to smash the price to floor and make the money they need to stay
afloat. Mergers cost money, network upgrades cost money, every time they
slip in cheap and press the locals out of business they win again. Spread
your streams out and stay the course. Install Dish, sell computers, offer
voip, network homes, fix computers, go onsite to fix the phones that the
phone companies charge to much for, install cable, etc... shore up your
business by spreading your weight out and when the ice gets thin from DSL
you won't fall through the ice
Sorry so lengthy... but Telco stands for lack of quality and your money is
leaving town. Rural America doesn't like.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] $20 'naked' DSL
Nice words from AT&T but...
I'm in Los Angeles County only 1/2 mile from the city/country line. AT&T
doesn't offer DSL here - apparently they don't think there are enough
customers to justify the cost of upgrading their network. Will AT&T be
required to offer DSL here? It sounds like they will according to the
terms of the AT&T purchase of Bell South. I think the Los Angeles market
is "at least 80% upgraded for broadband" but will AT&T ever REALLY offer
DSL here? I'm not holding my breath. Will there ever be any enforcement of
these merger terms? Again, I'm not holding my breath.
I don't want to seem (or feel) ungrateful because half the secret of
enjoying life is remembering to practice an "attitude of gratitude". I'm
grateful that there is a WISP in the area who provides me with 256 kbps
symmetrical service for "only" $99.99 per month.
Peter R. wrote:
January 16, 2007
AT&T to offer $20 'naked' DSL service
LESLIE CAULEY, USA TODAY
Cheaper high-speed Internet service is coming.
Within a few months, AT&T is expected to start charging $19.95 a month
for "naked" DSL, meaning you don't have to buy any other AT&T service,
including phone, to get that rate. It currently charges $45 for a
stand-alone broadband subscription.
AT&T also is developing $10 DSL for new subscribers who also buy
AT&T-branded phone service.
AT&T plans to offer both services for at least 30 months. The clock
starts as soon as the media giant starts selling them in any of the 22
states where it is the incumbent local phone company, including
California, Florida, Illinois and Texas.
Why so cheap? Three words: Federal Communications Commission.
The FCC, which has broad regulatory control over the U.S.
telecommunications industry, recently approved AT&T's acquisition of
BellSouth. To get needed votes from the FCC's two Democratic members,
AT&T agreed, reluctantly, to offer these DSL bargains.
AT&T is required to roll out the $19.95 offer within one year and the $10
rate within six months. Gene Kimmelman, public policy director of
Consumers Union, says he expects AT&T to move faster.
Under the terms of the FCC agreement, AT&T is required to offer naked DSL
for $19.95 in markets that are at least 80 percent upgraded for
broadband. That describes many of AT&T's biggest markets, says Kimmelman,
who helped negotiate the settlement.
Under the deal, AT&T's cheap DSL products will clock in at 768 kilobits
per second. While that's slower than the 1.5 megabits to 3 megabits
popular with many U.S. consumers, "it's more than good enough" for
Internet telephony, Kimmelman says.
As such, he thinks the twin offers could help spur sales of Internet
telephony across the United States. "This opens the door for consumers"
to pick other local and long-distance providers," Kimmelman says.
For years, Kimmelman notes, consumers had to pay double, essentially, if
they wanted to buy a high-speed broadband connection from one carrier and
phone service from another. He says that let phone companies such as AT&T
push broadband sales while preserving their core phone business, which
still accounts for the bulk of profit.
While AT&T, for example, charges $45 for naked DSL, it sells a bundle
that includes phone and DSL for just $28 a month.
Cable TV companies do the same thing. If purchased separately, Time
Warner charges $45 a month for its high-speed cable modem service and
$49.95 for digital phone. A bundle of both - plus TV service - costs $99.
Comcast's service is among the priciest: It charges almost $58 a month
for stand-alone broadband.
Kimmelman, for one, thinks AT&T's new DSL pricing will help "discipline"
broadband pricing. Once AT&T's $19.95 rate for naked DSL is broadly
available, other broadband providers, including cable, "will be
hard-pressed to keep hiding behind a higher price."
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Newsletters Downloadable from http://ask-wi.com/newsletters.html
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220 www.ask-wi.com
WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com
WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org