As soon as I can this info, I will answer these questions Scriv. So far we we only see 1.5M for coverage with the current rev of software.
-Dee Alaska Wireless Systems 1(907)240-2183 Cell 1(907)349-2226 Fax 1(907)349-4308 Office www.akwireless.net ----- Original Message ----- From: John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:54:52 -0900 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Another expert heard from. > So can we get some real world data on how well it is working? Is the > terrain flat? Wooded? What kind of coverage area are you seeing? Power > levels up and down? Speeds up and down per client? Maximum CPE per > sector currently? Bandwidth used per sector? Is this 802.16 "d" or "e"? > FDD or TDD? Can you tell I have a few questions about WiMax? > Scriv > > > W.D.McKinney wrote: > > >We have BreezeMax 2.3GHz up and running here now :-) > > > >-Dee > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Marlon K. Schafer > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: WISPA General List > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:31:57 -0900 > >Subject: > >Re: [WISPA] Another expert heard from. > > > > > > > > > >>I wonder where the heck the idea that WiMax has a stronger signal than > wifi. > >> > >>Clearly these guys are talking about licensed vs. unlicensed wimax eh? > >> > >>laters, > >>marlon > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > >>Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:40 AM > >>Subject: [WISPA] Another expert heard from. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>All, > >>> > >>>I ran across this article and found it quite amusing. > >>> > >>>As quoted from the article; > >>> > >>>"Newtowne Court public housing, chosen for its proximity to public > >>>buildings and its high percentage of school-age children, is already > >>>equipped with 20 to 30 antennae for WiFi, said Hart. Hart said the > project > >>> > >>> > >>>is being stalled because the 20 to 30 antennae aren’t strong enough. > >>> > >>>The next step for the city is to implement so-called WiMax, a stronger > >>>signal that will someday provide mobile wireless connectivity without a > >>>base station antenna. > >>> > >>>“The technology today doesn’t penetrate walls very well; leaves can > >>> > >>> > >>even > >> > >> > >>>get in its way because it’s a radio signal,” said Hart. “Right > >>> > >>> > >>behind this > >> > >> > >>>technology is WiMax. Nobody’s selling that yet but it’s so close to > >>> > >>> > >>taking > >> > >> > >>>over WiFi, it’s holding up a lot of projects.” " > >>> > >>>Link to full article below; > >>>http://www.townonline.com/cambridge/homepage/8998949105128439806 > >>> > >>>Regards, > >>>Dawn DiPietro > >>>-- > >>>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >>> > >>>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > >>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >>> > >>>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >> > >>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > >>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> > >>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > >> > >> > >> > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
