David:
Mostly due to inputs from WISPs that made a good point, and as you
did below with Cambridge Broadband, FCC certification is moot outside
the US, so I'm dropping the mention / requirement of FCC
certification for companies to be on the list. I will continue to
list only companies that offer radio systems, however - not merely
radio modules.
Thanks,
Steve
On Feb 16, 2007, at Feb 16 05:41 AM, David Peterson wrote:
Sorry for the old reference, Ultramesh is no long with us. I only
consult
at this time. I noticed some companies on your list that are not
selling
certified gear, and as such should not be posted publicly as doing
so by an
industry journalist. This would cause some people to purchase
products that
they themselves would not have done so without your assertion.
However, I will follow up my statement with additional research.
Aruba Networks
I would have to say I am likely wrong here, and if they are on this
list
please forward your FCC ID if you like. Their product page shows
equipment
with the following "Electromagnetic Compliance" Although their url to
country certification list shows a 404 page.
# FCC Part 15 Class B
# FCC Part 15 Class C 15.207/15.247
# FCC Part 15 Class E 15.407
# ICES-003 Class A
# RSS 210 (CAN)
# VCCI Class A
# EN 61000-3, EN 61000-4-2, EN 61000-4-3, EN 61000-4-4
# EN 61000-4-5, EN 61000-4-6, EN 61000-4-8, EN 61000-4-11
# 73/23/EEC and 89/336/EEC
# EN 55022, EN55024 (89/336/EEC)
# ETS 300 328 (89/336/EEC), ETS 301 489 (89/336/EEC)
# ETS 301 893
# AS/NZS 3548 Class A
# RFS 29 (NZ)
Avantry
I find them at Wincomm, but not at the FCC site under Avantry or
Witcom.
However, given the style and cost of their equipment, its unlikely
that they
have spent the kind of R&D money they appear to have spent without
getting
certifed. Again if anyone from Avantry/Witcom or even Wincomm
wants to
forward the ID# to this list please feel free.
Cambridge Broadband
They appear to sell outside the US and operate in 3.5, 10.5 and 26
Ghz FDD
equipment. As such they are unlikely FCC certified, but are likely
certified in many other countries. Looks pricey.
http://www.cambridgebroadband.com/contact.htm
CarrierComm
Appears to be an ASIC and OEM manufacturer for the cellular
industry. That
one is out of my knowledge field, but my first thought would be
that they
are compliant with the regulations for SDR.
CoCo Communications
They seem to have added a protocol to existing linux based equipment.
Question for the industry: If you change the firmware on existing
access
points and rebrand them to your company, are you required to
recertify the
equipment?
Deliberant
Nothing further on them.
EION Wireless
Appears to have bought the Wi-Lan product line. Their other
equipment,
however doesn't show up under any FCC search. If anyone from EION
wants to
chime in, please do.
GIL Technology
Seems to be the Taiwanese manufacturer for the old Wi-Lan product
line.
http://www.gil.com.tw/eng/product/wireless/libra5800.htm
Qorvus
Nothing further on them. No FCC ID's for their WRAP board + linux
offering
(based on LocustWorld) + CM9/Senao 2511MP based products.
David Peterson
No longer with the now defunct Ultramesh Inc.
---
Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Writing about BWIA again! - www.bwianews.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
