I'm sold. Anyone wanna buy me some? COMNET has nice pricing on CPE's, but are there any discounts on the AU's? There's so many parts it seems between the blade chassis and that, I don't even know what parts that I'd need to order.
Also, I was concerned with the blade chassis that 200' of LMR400 would be too lossy to be useful - or does this have some kind of low frequency IF signalling that's used on the cable itself? Some equipment I've noticed uses a much lower frequency up the tower that even LMR175 could be used. Can I use this on an non-live, unipole, AM radio tower? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 12:01 PM Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers... I found this thread interesting. Enjoy, marlon ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Leary To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:51 PM Subject: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers... [...] How do the APs handle VoIP traffic? Is there anything that can assist this? Better, literally, than any other AP in unlicensed, with up 288 CONCURRENT VoIP calls per AP (we call them AUs) with a MOS of better than 4.0. With the WLP feature implemented, MOS is typically over 4.1 and many tests show over 4.4. (I have some great VoIP graphs). We can also run tons of concurrent data. The graphs show this too. What is a realistic number of concurrent VoIP sessions an AP can handle? VL is the only product that can literally and dynamically prioritize VoIP over the entire pipe and across the entire sector (versus just dedicating a partition that must be allocated whether used or not). At the same time, VL has a starvation prevention mechanism to prevent starvation of low priority traffic. -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
