Is the issue one of cost where the WISP "A" does not have budget for additonal servers/network analytics tools, hardware infrastructure? What problem are you trying to solve?
Felix --- Jeromie Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You would classically arrange a peering agreement. > You hand each other > a equal amount of capacity (say 1mbit) and a BGP > table. You each use > the link like another upstream provider, balancing > routes vs capacity > vs (what ever else you want). Some peerages have a > set cost per bit > transfered and the groups settle up monthly. The > main problem I see is > one entity will be at a disadvantage then the other > due to size. Say > isp A has 2 peers, the other has 4. That means isp B > will "need" isp > A's links less then B needs A's. There is a very > (in)famous case of > exactly that (AOL and Cogent). How do you value your > peering abilities > vs those of someone else, with more or less peers > and more or less > capacity. > > > On 4/26/07, Jory Privett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have two PoPs where I have bandwidth for my > network. In the same area I > > know of at least 4 other WISPs that have bandwidth > also. I was just wanting > > to establish a link to one or more of them and > start routing (BGP most > > likely) and pass traffic over each others network. > This would allow each to > > have more capacity and redundancy and not have to > pay any large amount for > > it. I know all of the big players do it and it is > the basic fabric the > > internet is made of. I was just wondering if any > WISPs do it and how? > > > > Jory Privett > > WCCS > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] WISP Peering > > > > > > > Jory, > > > > > > I am not sure what you are trying to do with the > other WISP's in your > > > area. Can you a little more clear on what you > are thinking of? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dawn DiPietro > > > > > > Jory Privett wrote: > > >> There are several WISP in my area I was > wanting to talk to some of them > > >> about bandwidth peering. I know that most will > not want anything to do > > >> with it since they refuse to co-operate in any > other way but I wanted to > > >> make the effort. Has anyone else done this > type of thing? What > > >> paperwork needs to be done to protect each > company? How do you control > > >> throughput to and from each network and routing > issues? Any help her > > >> would be greatly appreciated. > > >> > > >> Jory Privett > > >> WCCS > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > > > Archives: > http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > -- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: > http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
